Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
AI Abilities by 2036
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Thelema" data-source="post: 255574" data-attributes="member: 15114"><p>AI is pretty impressive, but what we have now is nowhere close to having a legitimate, general artificial intelligence. ChatGPT is -- more or less - a glorified autocorrect. That's why it can have serious trouble, for example, playing chess. Try it sometime. ChatGPT often tries to make illegal moves, tries to move pieces that aren't there, tries to capture pieces that aren't there, or even creates new pieces. This is because it just doesn't understand chess. It knows that e5 is a common response to e4 because the language model picked that up from the data, but it doesn't understand what this means in any way. This is why you can never really finish a game of chess with GPT. It doesn't have the intelligence to make the right moves once the pieces are moved around a bit.</p><p></p><p>It does a great job at appearing to be having a conversation with you, but that's just large language models being large language models. I don't think we're going to have a legitimate general AI by 2036. There is still so much to go.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Thelema, post: 255574, member: 15114"] AI is pretty impressive, but what we have now is nowhere close to having a legitimate, general artificial intelligence. ChatGPT is -- more or less - a glorified autocorrect. That's why it can have serious trouble, for example, playing chess. Try it sometime. ChatGPT often tries to make illegal moves, tries to move pieces that aren't there, tries to capture pieces that aren't there, or even creates new pieces. This is because it just doesn't understand chess. It knows that e5 is a common response to e4 because the language model picked that up from the data, but it doesn't understand what this means in any way. This is why you can never really finish a game of chess with GPT. It doesn't have the intelligence to make the right moves once the pieces are moved around a bit. It does a great job at appearing to be having a conversation with you, but that's just large language models being large language models. I don't think we're going to have a legitimate general AI by 2036. There is still so much to go. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
AI Abilities by 2036
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top