Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Bedtime for Democracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 22152" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>Re: Bedtime for Democracy</strong></p><p></p><p>Actually, both Ashcroft and his successor have demonstrated a drooling eagerness to trample the law and the Constitution underfoot in order to do the bidding of Bush, who never saw a sentence that couldn't wear him out before he read through to the end of it.</p><p> </p><p>Individuals are appointed to the cabinet and insist upon being called "Judge." The entire administration is bent on being activist judges and forcing the courts to be activist <em>about Bush policies</em>. </p><p> </p><p>Under the Orwellian dangerphrase "activist judiciary," they have worked on a daily basis to force the courts to act outside of precedent and codified law to overturn valid State laws and Supreme Court cases upholding various forms of the right to privacy in sex, marriage, and reproduction-- and now in the realm of "life."</p><p> </p><p>Even the worst possible motives of the parties involved cannot justify the wreckage Bush has made of the doctrines of Separation of Powers and Preemption, and States' Rights. Remember that the "conservatives" were originally against "big government." Certainly you hear very little of that nowadays.</p><p> </p><p>To Bush, the courts are simply bureaus which stamp approval on his weird and unnatural plans to collapse the government into one Branch, and all of the military and intelligence organizations run out of the Oval Office. That, my friend, is what should make you angry, not the decision by one State, through its legally-endowed authorities, to let somebody die sooner.</p><p> </p><p>If Bush succeeds, we're all in deep trouble.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 22152, member: 42"] [b]Re: Bedtime for Democracy[/b] Actually, both Ashcroft and his successor have demonstrated a drooling eagerness to trample the law and the Constitution underfoot in order to do the bidding of Bush, who never saw a sentence that couldn't wear him out before he read through to the end of it. Individuals are appointed to the cabinet and insist upon being called "Judge." The entire administration is bent on being activist judges and forcing the courts to be activist [i]about Bush policies[/i]. Under the Orwellian dangerphrase "activist judiciary," they have worked on a daily basis to force the courts to act outside of precedent and codified law to overturn valid State laws and Supreme Court cases upholding various forms of the right to privacy in sex, marriage, and reproduction-- and now in the realm of "life." Even the worst possible motives of the parties involved cannot justify the wreckage Bush has made of the doctrines of Separation of Powers and Preemption, and States' Rights. Remember that the "conservatives" were originally against "big government." Certainly you hear very little of that nowadays. To Bush, the courts are simply bureaus which stamp approval on his weird and unnatural plans to collapse the government into one Branch, and all of the military and intelligence organizations run out of the Oval Office. That, my friend, is what should make you angry, not the decision by one State, through its legally-endowed authorities, to let somebody die sooner. If Bush succeeds, we're all in deep trouble. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Bedtime for Democracy
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top