Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Bedtime for Democracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zoomerz" data-source="post: 22222" data-attributes="member: 390"><p><strong>Re: Bedtime for Democracy</strong></p><p></p><p>Pauli;</p><p></p><p></p><p>Respectfully, do you call 19 adjudications since 1998 "quick"? No individual case in history has received this much attention, or been given more time in the courts in order to reach the most accurate outcome.</p><p></p><p>If you have read the "reasons" why these affidavit testimonies were not admitted, then you would realize that they WERE considered. Now, I could believe that 1, 2, EVEN 3 judges that heard this case might have had predispositions (I doubt it, but it's possible). But there's no way you can tell me THEY ALL DID.</p><p></p><p>Have you read the judge's decisions? Even the parents themselves did not call on the 2 nurses' testimonies. Why not? Because their allegations could be proven to be inaccurate (or "Incredible" as one judge put it), that's why. They do nothing to help the parent's case.</p><p></p><p>I'm not asking anyone to change or be of any certain opinion here. Just please be informed. Read the decisions. Be armed with as much information as possible before having an opinion. </p><p></p><p>Z-</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zoomerz, post: 22222, member: 390"] [b]Re: Bedtime for Democracy[/b] Pauli; Respectfully, do you call 19 adjudications since 1998 "quick"? No individual case in history has received this much attention, or been given more time in the courts in order to reach the most accurate outcome. If you have read the "reasons" why these affidavit testimonies were not admitted, then you would realize that they WERE considered. Now, I could believe that 1, 2, EVEN 3 judges that heard this case might have had predispositions (I doubt it, but it's possible). But there's no way you can tell me THEY ALL DID. Have you read the judge's decisions? Even the parents themselves did not call on the 2 nurses' testimonies. Why not? Because their allegations could be proven to be inaccurate (or "Incredible" as one judge put it), that's why. They do nothing to help the parent's case. I'm not asking anyone to change or be of any certain opinion here. Just please be informed. Read the decisions. Be armed with as much information as possible before having an opinion. Z- [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Bedtime for Democracy
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top