Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Can the 2008 elections really be stopped?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 35774" data-attributes="member: 443"><p><strong>Re: Can the 2008 elections really be stopped?</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">From The Minority Report (among other sites):</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'"><a href="http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/blog_entry/ken_taylor/2008/10/14/barack_obama_admits_socialism_spread_the_wealth" target="_blank">Source</a></span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">I highlighted the pertinant points.</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Obama's "cuts" are actually credits. "Credits" means free money in the form of government checks, for those that pay no income taxes (as was stated above, that's 44% of the adult population.)</span></span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">I have looked, see?</span></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Argue with Ken Taylor.</span></span></p><p> </p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">I believe I've said somewhere around here (maybe it was on a different board) that I don't hold anything any candidate says in a campaign against them anymore. They all say whatever it takes to win. I believe I have also said that Obama most likely won't be able to do this "redistribution of the wealth" anyway.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">However, with the Dems in control of both houses and the White House, I would suggest that you hold on to your wallet.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">Clinton's first term was won on his promise of a middle class tax cut. With less that 6 months in office, Clinton's tax cut morphed into the largest tax increase the Middle Class has ever seen.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">At any rate, I never said I don't like Obama. I preferred McCain, that's all. I said that here at Paranormalis too (maybe both statements were over at Unexplained-Mysteries, now that I think about it.)</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">I'm ready to get behind Obama right now. I will be in support of him until he pulls a Clinton on me.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">I felt the same way about Clinton.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 10px">And believe me, I'm aware that Obama was promising me money as well!</span></p><p> </p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">I'm all for helping the poor. But there's a right way and a wrong way to do it. That's all I've said in this thread all along.</span></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Anyway, I was for McCain because I've been a fan of his for decades now. I never expected to get to vote for him because he's pissed of the Republicans so many times I never thought he'd get nominated (that's why I like him, BTW. If you wonder about a politician - check how many times he's voted against his party line, how many times he's voted against his state's own interests, and how many times he's voted in a way that could lose him a re-election. McCain's done all three multiple times.)</span></span></p><p> <span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Comic Sans MS'"></span></p><p>So-called "mudslinging" in a campaign is a time-honored red-blooded apple pie American tradition. Like I showed you. It's also the reason I said I don't hold campaign rhetoric against any candidate. If you do hold it against them, and you're fair about it, then you can't ever support<strong> any</strong> candidate!</p><p> </p><p>Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 35774, member: 443"] [b]Re: Can the 2008 elections really be stopped?[/b] [SIZE=2]From The Minority Report (among other sites):[/SIZE] [SIZE=2][FONT=Verdana][URL="http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/blog_entry/ken_taylor/2008/10/14/barack_obama_admits_socialism_spread_the_wealth"]Source[/URL][/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][FONT=Verdana]I highlighted the pertinant points.[/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][FONT=Verdana]Obama's "cuts" are actually credits. "Credits" means free money in the form of government checks, for those that pay no income taxes (as was stated above, that's 44% of the adult population.)[/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][FONT=Verdana]I have looked, see?[/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=2][FONT=Verdana]Argue with Ken Taylor.[/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=2]I believe I've said somewhere around here (maybe it was on a different board) that I don't hold anything any candidate says in a campaign against them anymore. They all say whatever it takes to win. I believe I have also said that Obama most likely won't be able to do this "redistribution of the wealth" anyway.[/SIZE] [SIZE=2]However, with the Dems in control of both houses and the White House, I would suggest that you hold on to your wallet.[/SIZE] [SIZE=2]Clinton's first term was won on his promise of a middle class tax cut. With less that 6 months in office, Clinton's tax cut morphed into the largest tax increase the Middle Class has ever seen.[/SIZE] [SIZE=2]At any rate, I never said I don't like Obama. I preferred McCain, that's all. I said that here at Paranormalis too (maybe both statements were over at Unexplained-Mysteries, now that I think about it.)[/SIZE] [SIZE=2]I'm ready to get behind Obama right now. I will be in support of him until he pulls a Clinton on me.[/SIZE] [SIZE=2]I felt the same way about Clinton.[/SIZE] [SIZE=2]And believe me, I'm aware that Obama was promising me money as well![/SIZE] [FONT=Comic Sans MS][FONT=Verdana]I'm all for helping the poor. But there's a right way and a wrong way to do it. That's all I've said in this thread all along.[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Anyway, I was for McCain because I've been a fan of his for decades now. I never expected to get to vote for him because he's pissed of the Republicans so many times I never thought he'd get nominated (that's why I like him, BTW. If you wonder about a politician - check how many times he's voted against his party line, how many times he's voted against his state's own interests, and how many times he's voted in a way that could lose him a re-election. McCain's done all three multiple times.)[/FONT] [/FONT] So-called "mudslinging" in a campaign is a time-honored red-blooded apple pie American tradition. Like I showed you. It's also the reason I said I don't hold campaign rhetoric against any candidate. If you do hold it against them, and you're fair about it, then you can't ever support[B] any[/B] candidate! Harte [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Can the 2008 elections really be stopped?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top