Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Cern
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 34087" data-attributes="member: 443"><p><strong>Re: Cern</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Last I checked, gravitons are theoretical and should be detectable if real.</p><p> </p><p>I believe you're thinking of <em>tachyons,</em> which are also theoretical but they cease to exist at speeds less than the speed of light, so they are certainly undetectable.</p><p> </p><p>Tachyons exist (supposedly) on the other side of the lightspeed limit, sort of like on the other side of a mirror. They have similar properties to our normal particles, but react to velocity in a backwards sort of way.</p><p> </p><p>I mean by that that they gain mass as they slow down where as normal particles gain mass as they speed up.</p><p> </p><p>Tachyons exit the universe as they slow past the speed of light, whereas normal particles exit the universe as they speed up past the speed of light.</p><p> </p><p>Of course, neither scenario happens, it's just the way they explain it. I mean, it's just as impossible for a normal particle to go faster than light as it is for a tachyon to go slower than light.</p><p> </p><p>At any rate, nobody should be worried about Cern's mini black holes. They will evaporate almost as quickly as they form, if they form at all.</p><p> </p><p>In fact, the only way to detect them would be to find the result of their (former) presence, as is the case with a great many particles the particle physicists have "detected."</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 34087, member: 443"] [b]Re: Cern[/b] Last I checked, gravitons are theoretical and should be detectable if real. I believe you're thinking of [i]tachyons,[/i] which are also theoretical but they cease to exist at speeds less than the speed of light, so they are certainly undetectable. Tachyons exist (supposedly) on the other side of the lightspeed limit, sort of like on the other side of a mirror. They have similar properties to our normal particles, but react to velocity in a backwards sort of way. I mean by that that they gain mass as they slow down where as normal particles gain mass as they speed up. Tachyons exit the universe as they slow past the speed of light, whereas normal particles exit the universe as they speed up past the speed of light. Of course, neither scenario happens, it's just the way they explain it. I mean, it's just as impossible for a normal particle to go faster than light as it is for a tachyon to go slower than light. At any rate, nobody should be worried about Cern's mini black holes. They will evaporate almost as quickly as they form, if they form at all. In fact, the only way to detect them would be to find the result of their (former) presence, as is the case with a great many particles the particle physicists have "detected." [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Cern
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top