Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Did John Titor prevent the Y2K event?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="temporal recon" data-source="post: 69148" data-attributes="member: 2826"><p>My apologies, Sam. You are correct in stating that I did in fact end numerous sentences above with question marks. Yes, these are questions, but they were meant in a rhetorical sense in the hopes of elevating the level of discourse, to inspire those reading here now and later to possibly change the paradigm in which they place the Titor posts. I will be more careful next time. At no point did I expect you to actually answer questions such as:</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>The vast majority of the above questions were not meant for you personally, Sam. They were meant for the forum as a whole to get people to change their frame of reference regarding the Titor statements made in 2000-2001. How could I possibly expect you to know these answers? Again, they were rhetorical.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>There is only one person in this conversation who has identified themselves as a Titor expert, Sam.</p><p> </p><p>In a recent interview I did (full transcript available at <a href="http://convictionofatimetraveler-johntitor.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Conviction of a Time Traveler</a> ) I state that my own inquiries into the Titor story (and beyond) have been nothing but a constant realization and reassessment of what I thought I knew. I am no expert, Sam; far from it.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Of course you are, Sam. I would never try to convince you otherwise. My only small request would be that, as your standing as a Titor Expert on this forum, that you might identify your opinions as such. That's all.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Incredible indeed, but that's not exactly what I meant. How could I predict what your statements might do? I was merely drawing a parallel between the irresponsible statements by Darby over the last 13 years (you don't <strong><em>really</em></strong> think he thinks Titor is a hoax, do you?) and the likely damage his statements have done to your own statements and the possible (though unpredictable) results of your own statements.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>No Sam. I hold you in the highest regard. If my requests for factual rigidity are perceived as attacks, I apologize. They are not meant to be so.</p><p> </p><p>As Ever</p><p>Temporal Recon</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="temporal recon, post: 69148, member: 2826"] My apologies, Sam. You are correct in stating that I did in fact end numerous sentences above with question marks. Yes, these are questions, but they were meant in a rhetorical sense in the hopes of elevating the level of discourse, to inspire those reading here now and later to possibly change the paradigm in which they place the Titor posts. I will be more careful next time. At no point did I expect you to actually answer questions such as: The vast majority of the above questions were not meant for you personally, Sam. They were meant for the forum as a whole to get people to change their frame of reference regarding the Titor statements made in 2000-2001. How could I possibly expect you to know these answers? Again, they were rhetorical. There is only one person in this conversation who has identified themselves as a Titor expert, Sam. In a recent interview I did (full transcript available at [URL='http://convictionofatimetraveler-johntitor.blogspot.com/']Conviction of a Time Traveler[/URL] ) I state that my own inquiries into the Titor story (and beyond) have been nothing but a constant realization and reassessment of what I thought I knew. I am no expert, Sam; far from it. Of course you are, Sam. I would never try to convince you otherwise. My only small request would be that, as your standing as a Titor Expert on this forum, that you might identify your opinions as such. That's all. Incredible indeed, but that's not exactly what I meant. How could I predict what your statements might do? I was merely drawing a parallel between the irresponsible statements by Darby over the last 13 years (you don't [B][I]really[/I][/B] think he thinks Titor is a hoax, do you?) and the likely damage his statements have done to your own statements and the possible (though unpredictable) results of your own statements. No Sam. I hold you in the highest regard. If my requests for factual rigidity are perceived as attacks, I apologize. They are not meant to be so. As Ever Temporal Recon [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Did John Titor prevent the Y2K event?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top