Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Evidence supporting Gibbs's time machine?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="didomusicuk" data-source="post: 61569" data-attributes="member: 3545"><p>I have to agree. Judging by the evidence I've seen from multiple sources, its still very unclear regarding what an HDR is actually meant to do... sure, you can state all the electromagnetic forces it either generates or manipulates, but that doesn't really explain what its got to do with time travel, and how exactly it can be used. For instance, is it meant to create a field surrounding the unit, which can be made big enough for a person or object to be included in the field, and therefore "travel"?</p><p> </p><p>The videos of the watch going backwards is merely a result of electromagnetic force being applied directly to it, making it go backwards.The watch is going back in time, nor is it being affected in any other way. The only way to prove that the HDR works would be to shield a camcorder or other recording device, and place it within the field generated by the HDR, and view the results. If the camcorder records something different to what it should have recorded, then perhaps there is something there. Until that time, I remain very unconvinced.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="didomusicuk, post: 61569, member: 3545"] I have to agree. Judging by the evidence I've seen from multiple sources, its still very unclear regarding what an HDR is actually meant to do... sure, you can state all the electromagnetic forces it either generates or manipulates, but that doesn't really explain what its got to do with time travel, and how exactly it can be used. For instance, is it meant to create a field surrounding the unit, which can be made big enough for a person or object to be included in the field, and therefore "travel"? The videos of the watch going backwards is merely a result of electromagnetic force being applied directly to it, making it go backwards.The watch is going back in time, nor is it being affected in any other way. The only way to prove that the HDR works would be to shield a camcorder or other recording device, and place it within the field generated by the HDR, and view the results. If the camcorder records something different to what it should have recorded, then perhaps there is something there. Until that time, I remain very unconvinced. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Evidence supporting Gibbs's time machine?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top