Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
First reaction to John Titor story
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 9011" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>First reaction to John Titor story</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The only reasons I feel this theory is not possible is that it would take three things:</p><p></p><p>1. A large number of people in on a conspiracy.</p><p></p><p>2. Keeping a secret.</p><p></p><p>3. Keeping a secret over a long period of time.</p><p></p><p></p><p>It is hard for me to believe that there wouldn't be one person out of the group that wouldn't expose the hoax. In essence, it seems that the entire US government is against the populace. I'm all for conspiracy theories, I have an open mind, but this would require me to distrust/question almost all elected and hired officials of the US government. Hard to believe.</p><p></p><p>"Mom"</p><p style="text-align: right"></p><p>[/b]</p></blockquote><p></p><p></p><p>It is a mistake to think that a conspiracy must be competent or even completely successful. For example, the FBI continues to struggle to conceal certain aspects of the JFK case, and finds itself contrary to the interests of the CIA and Justice Dept.</p><p></p><p>It is a mistake to think that a conspiracy requires secrecy. In a way, it oddly requires leakage to get anywhere, because it often depends upon intimidation, and a strange reputation for clamping down on leaks. In other words, it needs a leak to show what it will do if there's a leak.</p><p></p><p>It is a mistake to think that a conspiracy has a deadline or due date. The professed goal of the CIA, for example, is to conduct massive operations, involving sometimes entire populations, as secretly as possible, and to make the operation "secure," or, in other words, permanent. This is why the truth about the South and Central American military dictators is still obscured after 50 years, in spite of the fact that the whole prank took most of that time to pull.</p><p></p><p>Our government has been involved in deep studies of "scenarios" since the beginning of the Cold War, boosted by computer science, and most of the scenarios involve nuclear catastrophe and terrorist strikes and invasions. One of the most popular scenarios before 1963 was "assassination of the president." The scenarios include prospective futures caused by upheaval.</p><p></p><p>Titor resembles a government scenario even more than he does a science fiction story.</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 9011, member: 42"] [b]First reaction to John Titor story[/b] The only reasons I feel this theory is not possible is that it would take three things: 1. A large number of people in on a conspiracy. 2. Keeping a secret. 3. Keeping a secret over a long period of time. It is hard for me to believe that there wouldn't be one person out of the group that wouldn't expose the hoax. In essence, it seems that the entire US government is against the populace. I'm all for conspiracy theories, I have an open mind, but this would require me to distrust/question almost all elected and hired officials of the US government. Hard to believe. "Mom" [right][/right] [/b][/quote] It is a mistake to think that a conspiracy must be competent or even completely successful. For example, the FBI continues to struggle to conceal certain aspects of the JFK case, and finds itself contrary to the interests of the CIA and Justice Dept. It is a mistake to think that a conspiracy requires secrecy. In a way, it oddly requires leakage to get anywhere, because it often depends upon intimidation, and a strange reputation for clamping down on leaks. In other words, it needs a leak to show what it will do if there's a leak. It is a mistake to think that a conspiracy has a deadline or due date. The professed goal of the CIA, for example, is to conduct massive operations, involving sometimes entire populations, as secretly as possible, and to make the operation "secure," or, in other words, permanent. This is why the truth about the South and Central American military dictators is still obscured after 50 years, in spite of the fact that the whole prank took most of that time to pull. Our government has been involved in deep studies of "scenarios" since the beginning of the Cold War, boosted by computer science, and most of the scenarios involve nuclear catastrophe and terrorist strikes and invasions. One of the most popular scenarios before 1963 was "assassination of the president." The scenarios include prospective futures caused by upheaval. Titor resembles a government scenario even more than he does a science fiction story. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
First reaction to John Titor story
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top