Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Store
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
Fixed the internet, called it my Home.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ayasano" data-source="post: 87408" data-attributes="member: 4804"><p>As a physicist I would really have hoped Henry Stapp would not have fallen prey to the old fallacy that waves only collapse when exposed to consciousness. (Clearly "scientist" doesn't always equal "correct") "Observed" does <em>not</em> mean looked at by a scientist, it means when <em>two particles in<span style="font-size: 15px">t</span>eract</em>.<span style="font-size: 22px"> <span style="font-size: 15px">eg. photons interacting with the stream of photons in the Double Slit experiment so you can <em>observe</em> the result. No interaction means no observation.</span></span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why?</p><p></p><p>I pursue science because I seek an understanding of the world through natural laws that is actually useful to me. To me, the world can be adequately explained without the need for a god or gods, therefore the divine is unecessary.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What is this supposed to mean in the context of our discussion?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ayasano, post: 87408, member: 4804"] As a physicist I would really have hoped Henry Stapp would not have fallen prey to the old fallacy that waves only collapse when exposed to consciousness. (Clearly "scientist" doesn't always equal "correct") "Observed" does [I]not[/I] mean looked at by a scientist, it means when [I]two particles in[SIZE=4]t[/SIZE]eract[/I].[SIZE=6][B][SIZE=4] [/SIZE][/B][SIZE=4]eg. photons interacting with the stream of photons in the Double Slit experiment so you can [I]observe[/I] the result. No interaction means no observation.[/SIZE][B][/B][/SIZE] Why? I pursue science because I seek an understanding of the world through natural laws that is actually useful to me. To me, the world can be adequately explained without the need for a god or gods, therefore the divine is unecessary. What is this supposed to mean in the context of our discussion? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
Fixed the internet, called it my Home.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top