Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Psychic Ability & Powers of the Mind
Hdr Debate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ZeoEmeraude" data-source="post: 46300" data-attributes="member: 6"><p><span style="color: #339966">"Who developed remote viewing?</span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #339966">The russians did back in the 50's. The US had to play catch up. These technologies are now available for free to all users. Rather than learn these technologies skeptics prefer to attack me. SOP is to use profanity laden posts."</span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #3366ff">OK bub, you don't need an electromagnet to remote view. That medium can be done with paper, pencil, and a quiet room. The whole metal detector analogy is tripe...bottom line. Of course you are going to find more coins with one than without. It makes no sense that you would even write these sentences. As for profanity laden posts...I haven't read one in quite some time....unless you are just so sensitive, that you take every word as criticality as you do your predictions. So here's the deal Kid.....you want folks to take you seriously...then post some science behind the device. Not a link, actual science. That would involve using the Scientific Method. If you do not know what that is...I would be more than happy to explain it to you. </span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #ffffff"><span style="font-size: 13px"><span style="font-family: 'sans-serif'"> The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_English_Dictionary" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0645ad"><span style="color: #ffffff">Oxford English Dictionary</span></span></a> says that scientific method is: "a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses."</span></span></span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #000000"><span style="font-size: 13px"><span style="font-family: 'sans-serif'"><span style="color: #ffffff">A linearized, pragmatic scheme of the four points above is sometimes offered as a guideline for proceeding:<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method#cite_note-48" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0645ad"><span style="color: #ffffff">]</span></span></a></span></span></span></span></p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: #ffffff">Define a question</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: #ffffff">Gather information and resources (observe)</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: #ffffff">Form an explanatory hypothesis</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: #ffffff">Test the hypothesis by performing an experiment and collecting data in a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducibility" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0645ad"><span style="color: #ffffff">reproducible</span></span></a> manner</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: #ffffff">Analyze the data</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: #ffffff">Interpret the data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting point for new hypothesis</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: #ffffff">Publish results</span></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ol"><span style="color: #ffffff">Retest (frequently done by other scientists) </span></li> </ol><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><span style="font-family: 'sans-serif'"><span style="color: #3366ff">See this is why we ask you for video of you using the HDR. Not because we want to ridicule you, but because we want to observe the device in question. Not many people are going to strap that thing to them to test it. I once saw Dr. Z use the device. I was not impressed at all. You can probably still find the video on YouTube. Use the Method I listed.......Post full and detailed results of your findings, and allow the community (some members have backgrounds in the Sciences) to review the results of your hypothesis. This not only allows for a more civilized debate, but it puts to rest the questions regarding the device, and your bias towards it. <span style="color: #993366">(Definitions taken from Wikipedia) </span></span></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ZeoEmeraude, post: 46300, member: 6"] [COLOR=#339966]"Who developed remote viewing?[/COLOR] [COLOR=#339966]The russians did back in the 50's. The US had to play catch up. These technologies are now available for free to all users. Rather than learn these technologies skeptics prefer to attack me. SOP is to use profanity laden posts."[/COLOR] [COLOR=#3366ff]OK bub, you don't need an electromagnet to remote view. That medium can be done with paper, pencil, and a quiet room. The whole metal detector analogy is tripe...bottom line. Of course you are going to find more coins with one than without. It makes no sense that you would even write these sentences. As for profanity laden posts...I haven't read one in quite some time....unless you are just so sensitive, that you take every word as criticality as you do your predictions. So here's the deal Kid.....you want folks to take you seriously...then post some science behind the device. Not a link, actual science. That would involve using the Scientific Method. If you do not know what that is...I would be more than happy to explain it to you. [/COLOR] [COLOR=#ffffff][SIZE=13px][FONT=sans-serif] The [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_English_Dictionary'][COLOR=#0645ad][COLOR=#ffffff]Oxford English Dictionary[/COLOR][/COLOR][/URL] says that scientific method is: "a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses."[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=sans-serif][COLOR=#ffffff]A linearized, pragmatic scheme of the four points above is sometimes offered as a guideline for proceeding:[URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method#cite_note-48'][COLOR=#0645ad][COLOR=#ffffff]][/COLOR][/COLOR][/URL][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR] [LIST=1] [*][COLOR=#ffffff]Define a question[/COLOR] [*][COLOR=#ffffff]Gather information and resources (observe)[/COLOR] [*][COLOR=#ffffff]Form an explanatory hypothesis[/COLOR] [*][COLOR=#ffffff]Test the hypothesis by performing an experiment and collecting data in a [URL='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducibility'][COLOR=#0645ad][COLOR=#ffffff]reproducible[/COLOR][/COLOR][/URL] manner[/COLOR] [*][COLOR=#ffffff]Analyze the data[/COLOR] [*][COLOR=#ffffff]Interpret the data and draw conclusions that serve as a starting point for new hypothesis[/COLOR] [*][COLOR=#ffffff]Publish results[/COLOR] [*][COLOR=#ffffff]Retest (frequently done by other scientists) [/COLOR] [/LIST] [SIZE=4][FONT=sans-serif][COLOR=#3366ff]See this is why we ask you for video of you using the HDR. Not because we want to ridicule you, but because we want to observe the device in question. Not many people are going to strap that thing to them to test it. I once saw Dr. Z use the device. I was not impressed at all. You can probably still find the video on YouTube. Use the Method I listed.......Post full and detailed results of your findings, and allow the community (some members have backgrounds in the Sciences) to review the results of your hypothesis. This not only allows for a more civilized debate, but it puts to rest the questions regarding the device, and your bias towards it. [COLOR=#993366](Definitions taken from Wikipedia) [/COLOR][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Psychic Ability & Powers of the Mind
Hdr Debate
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top