Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
HDR Design Ideas and Experiments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 145298" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>I think the confusion is deliberately initiated by the educational community. Any scalar quantity is not a vector. Where as a wave phenomena which is time varying is a vector quantity. But there is a wave phenomena which might fit the requirements of being a scalar quantity. That would be a standing wave. It doesn't vary in intensity with time. Instead it varies in intensity with distance. Which does suggest transmission time would be non-existant, or instantaneous. I don't see transmission times for standing waves in the textbooks. Conveniently missing. So perhaps it would be advantageous to start thinking of scalar waves as standing waves.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 145298, member: 288"] I think the confusion is deliberately initiated by the educational community. Any scalar quantity is not a vector. Where as a wave phenomena which is time varying is a vector quantity. But there is a wave phenomena which might fit the requirements of being a scalar quantity. That would be a standing wave. It doesn't vary in intensity with time. Instead it varies in intensity with distance. Which does suggest transmission time would be non-existant, or instantaneous. I don't see transmission times for standing waves in the textbooks. Conveniently missing. So perhaps it would be advantageous to start thinking of scalar waves as standing waves. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
HDR Design Ideas and Experiments
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top