Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Cryptozoology & Mythical Beings
Hobbit or Hoax?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HDRKID" data-source="post: 141100" data-attributes="member: 43"><p>A cop once told me. "When some one is constantly changing their story, it is a bad sign."</p><p></p><p>First it was 12,000 years ago... now it is 50,000 years ago.</p><p></p><p>TAKEN FROM <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/kristinakillgrove/2016/03/31/new-homo-floresiensis-dates-may-quash-cryptozoology-theories-about-hobbits/#5ffba15e1629" target="_blank">New Homo Floresiensis Dates May Quash Cryptozoology Theories About 'Hobbits'</a></p><p><em>When the “hobbit” remains were thought to date to as recently as 12,000 years ago, these legends about Ebu Gogo started sounding like they could refer to H. floresiensis. The <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature17179.html" target="_blank">new <em>Nature </em>paper</a>, however, uses cutting-edge analysis of geology to push the date of disappearance of the “hobbits” back to 50,000 years ago. Or, at least, this is the date that the “hobbits” left the cave at Liang Bua. Research authors Thomas Sutikna and colleagues write that, “Whether H. floresiensis survived after 50 kyr ago — potentially encountering modern humans on Flores or other hominins dispersing through southeast <a href="http://www.forbes.com/asia/" target="_blank">Asia</a>, such as Denisovans — is an open question.”</em></p><p></p><p>A DNA test would tell us if they are ancient humans or another species. Sadly, if you listen to the video, you will see that all the DNA test results were lost - how convenient.</p><p></p><p>Genetics tests would tell us if the small skull belong to a person with trisomy 21 AKA Downs syndrome.</p><p><a href="http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/hobbits-are-not-real-analysis-new-human-species-homo-floresiensis-consistent-downs-1459786" target="_blank">Hobbits Are Not Real: Analysis of 'New Human Species' Homo Floresiensis 'Consistent with Down's Syndrome'</a></p><p></p><p>Sadly, the DNA tests results were lost and they have not done any more.</p><p></p><p>What we do know is that the facial asymmetry was 6% and this is consistent with abnormal fetal development and this is not a normal person. Most people have less than 1% facial asymmetry, but you will find 6% in people with down syndrome. Also, we have just one skull and that is simply not enough evidence to claim a brand new species.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.sciencealert.com/the-hobbit-was-a-human-with-down-syndrome-not-a-separate-species" target="_blank">The 'Hobbit' was a human with Down syndrome, not a separate species</a></p><p></p><p>Teuku Jacob, Indonesia’s premier paleoanthropologist believes Homo floresiensis is not a new species. Rather instead it is a modern melanesian suffering from microcephaly. Not doubt you have seen tiny skulls in babies born with the Zika virus.</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/22/science/22tiny.html?_r=0" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/22/science/22tiny.html?_r=0</a></p><p></p><p>When some one is constantly lying to you. It is hard to know what the truth is.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://sportsmasher.com/2015/05/26/animal-planets-cannibal-in-the-jungle-was-fake-with-elements-of-fact/" target="_blank">Animal Planet’s “Cannibal In The Jungle” Was Fake With Elements Of Fact</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HDRKID, post: 141100, member: 43"] A cop once told me. "When some one is constantly changing their story, it is a bad sign." First it was 12,000 years ago... now it is 50,000 years ago. TAKEN FROM [URL="http://www.forbes.com/sites/kristinakillgrove/2016/03/31/new-homo-floresiensis-dates-may-quash-cryptozoology-theories-about-hobbits/#5ffba15e1629"]New Homo Floresiensis Dates May Quash Cryptozoology Theories About 'Hobbits'[/URL] [I]When the “hobbit” remains were thought to date to as recently as 12,000 years ago, these legends about Ebu Gogo started sounding like they could refer to H. floresiensis. The [URL='http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature17179.html']new [I]Nature [/I]paper[/URL], however, uses cutting-edge analysis of geology to push the date of disappearance of the “hobbits” back to 50,000 years ago. Or, at least, this is the date that the “hobbits” left the cave at Liang Bua. Research authors Thomas Sutikna and colleagues write that, “Whether H. floresiensis survived after 50 kyr ago — potentially encountering modern humans on Flores or other hominins dispersing through southeast [URL='http://www.forbes.com/asia/']Asia[/URL], such as Denisovans — is an open question.”[/I] A DNA test would tell us if they are ancient humans or another species. Sadly, if you listen to the video, you will see that all the DNA test results were lost - how convenient. Genetics tests would tell us if the small skull belong to a person with trisomy 21 AKA Downs syndrome. [URL="http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/hobbits-are-not-real-analysis-new-human-species-homo-floresiensis-consistent-downs-1459786"]Hobbits Are Not Real: Analysis of 'New Human Species' Homo Floresiensis 'Consistent with Down's Syndrome'[/URL] Sadly, the DNA tests results were lost and they have not done any more. What we do know is that the facial asymmetry was 6% and this is consistent with abnormal fetal development and this is not a normal person. Most people have less than 1% facial asymmetry, but you will find 6% in people with down syndrome. Also, we have just one skull and that is simply not enough evidence to claim a brand new species. [URL="http://www.sciencealert.com/the-hobbit-was-a-human-with-down-syndrome-not-a-separate-species"]The 'Hobbit' was a human with Down syndrome, not a separate species[/URL] Teuku Jacob, Indonesia’s premier paleoanthropologist believes Homo floresiensis is not a new species. Rather instead it is a modern melanesian suffering from microcephaly. Not doubt you have seen tiny skulls in babies born with the Zika virus. [URL]http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/22/science/22tiny.html?_r=0[/URL] When some one is constantly lying to you. It is hard to know what the truth is. [URL="http://sportsmasher.com/2015/05/26/animal-planets-cannibal-in-the-jungle-was-fake-with-elements-of-fact/"]Animal Planet’s “Cannibal In The Jungle” Was Fake With Elements Of Fact[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Cryptozoology & Mythical Beings
Hobbit or Hoax?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top