Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Alternate Histories & Timelines
I think I've slid into another worldline, again.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="paradox404" data-source="post: 143931" data-attributes="member: 4523"><p>In the current discussion, Orpheus's comment is relevant. The majority of science is more or less about the best guess. For instance I think x is the case, so I will test it against y. In that case I would not <u><em>know</em></u> that x is true, I would assume it is because all available information is suggesting x is the case.</p><p></p><p>In my case, the divergence number is one of my forms of evidence that suggests that my divergence number did in fact change. Considering all the changes that I've noticed so far, I can say with a high degree of probability that I did indeed jump around 0.006%. Aside from what was said from my perspective, there is no, physical, verifiable evidence that I can bring with me.</p><p></p><p>The John Titor foundation page with the divergence numbers, it had 5 rows instead of 6 in the world line I was just in. There was never a March 12 2009 entry, and certainty none at 1.900%. I know that because I made a wallpaper in high school that had the lowest number on it, being 1.941%...</p><p></p><p>I can't even remember what I would have done instead. That said, Amnesia is something that can be ruled out as well in this case. I have only had amnesia once, in that case I knew memories were missing but not what, I actually had amnesia because I suffered repeated childhood trauma at the hands of my father's "Uncle". I do not feel as if my memories are any different, nor do I feel any are missing. All I know is that some things are different and I have no clue why.</p><p></p><p>Here is the other point, even if my divergence numbers turn out to be wrong, the point is, is that they <u><em><strong>did</strong></em></u> change for me. Besides, the numbers actually give me a sort of comfort. You would not believe how much it can irritate you if you talk to a friend about something you talked about earlier but you never had that conversation... Having a divergence number can give a hint as to why one might not remember...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="paradox404, post: 143931, member: 4523"] In the current discussion, Orpheus's comment is relevant. The majority of science is more or less about the best guess. For instance I think x is the case, so I will test it against y. In that case I would not [U][I]know[/I][/U] that x is true, I would assume it is because all available information is suggesting x is the case. In my case, the divergence number is one of my forms of evidence that suggests that my divergence number did in fact change. Considering all the changes that I've noticed so far, I can say with a high degree of probability that I did indeed jump around 0.006%. Aside from what was said from my perspective, there is no, physical, verifiable evidence that I can bring with me. The John Titor foundation page with the divergence numbers, it had 5 rows instead of 6 in the world line I was just in. There was never a March 12 2009 entry, and certainty none at 1.900%. I know that because I made a wallpaper in high school that had the lowest number on it, being 1.941%... I can't even remember what I would have done instead. That said, Amnesia is something that can be ruled out as well in this case. I have only had amnesia once, in that case I knew memories were missing but not what, I actually had amnesia because I suffered repeated childhood trauma at the hands of my father's "Uncle". I do not feel as if my memories are any different, nor do I feel any are missing. All I know is that some things are different and I have no clue why. Here is the other point, even if my divergence numbers turn out to be wrong, the point is, is that they [U][I][B]did[/B][/I][/U] change for me. Besides, the numbers actually give me a sort of comfort. You would not believe how much it can irritate you if you talk to a friend about something you talked about earlier but you never had that conversation... Having a divergence number can give a hint as to why one might not remember... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Alternate Histories & Timelines
I think I've slid into another worldline, again.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top