Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Is a 1 World government really a bad thing?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wyldberi" data-source="post: 93956" data-attributes="member: 6095"><p>I'm not arguing with you that what we have sucks.</p><p></p><p>The founding fathers instigated a rebellion against King George and established a Federation through the Articles of Confederation. A few short years later they had to re-do things and wrote a Constitution. Why? The Articles of Confederation set up a government that was too weak to survive. Human nature was causing the separate States of the Confederation to try to get the better of all the other States.</p><p></p><p>In the Constitution the founding fathers expanded the powers the federal government had, but made it clear those powers were strictly limited in scope. The limits placed on the federal government by Constitution were defined through enumeration, with those powers and that authority not granted being retained by the State governments and by the People of the United States.</p><p></p><p>The problem we have today in this nation as I see it is that the federal government has ascribed to itself all sorts of powers and authority not listed in those enumerated by the Constitution. All three branches of government have been complicit in this usurpation. The executive branch uses executive orders, and hides behind the rubric of "national security" to do what it wants. The judicial branch issues rulings that directly contradict the text of the Constitution, and went so far as to stop the national election of 2000 before it was concluded, having no basis in Constitutional authority or legal precedent to do so. The legislative branch -- well, just as you say, they basically do nothing. The government officials in all three branches have been bought and paid for by the wealthy and by corporations; they no longer act on behalf of the American People.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, the founding fathers were mindful of the necessity of limiting the power of the government. Establishing a single government to control the world would only set the stage for the same type of flunkies currently serving in our federal government to take up residence in the seats of power of that "one world" government. The wealthy and the powerful would wind up buying them, too.</p><p></p><p>If the People of the USA are unable to put an end to the shenanigans going on now, here, how would you expect that they would be able to throw off the shackles of that world government?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wyldberi, post: 93956, member: 6095"] I'm not arguing with you that what we have sucks. The founding fathers instigated a rebellion against King George and established a Federation through the Articles of Confederation. A few short years later they had to re-do things and wrote a Constitution. Why? The Articles of Confederation set up a government that was too weak to survive. Human nature was causing the separate States of the Confederation to try to get the better of all the other States. In the Constitution the founding fathers expanded the powers the federal government had, but made it clear those powers were strictly limited in scope. The limits placed on the federal government by Constitution were defined through enumeration, with those powers and that authority not granted being retained by the State governments and by the People of the United States. The problem we have today in this nation as I see it is that the federal government has ascribed to itself all sorts of powers and authority not listed in those enumerated by the Constitution. All three branches of government have been complicit in this usurpation. The executive branch uses executive orders, and hides behind the rubric of "national security" to do what it wants. The judicial branch issues rulings that directly contradict the text of the Constitution, and went so far as to stop the national election of 2000 before it was concluded, having no basis in Constitutional authority or legal precedent to do so. The legislative branch -- well, just as you say, they basically do nothing. The government officials in all three branches have been bought and paid for by the wealthy and by corporations; they no longer act on behalf of the American People. Anyway, the founding fathers were mindful of the necessity of limiting the power of the government. Establishing a single government to control the world would only set the stage for the same type of flunkies currently serving in our federal government to take up residence in the seats of power of that "one world" government. The wealthy and the powerful would wind up buying them, too. If the People of the USA are unable to put an end to the shenanigans going on now, here, how would you expect that they would be able to throw off the shackles of that world government? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Is a 1 World government really a bad thing?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top