Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Is a 1 World government really a bad thing?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wyldberi" data-source="post: 93978" data-attributes="member: 6095"><p>The big difference is what would you do about the population problem. I'm not an advocate for genocide, but there are an excess of human beings living on this planet. If the present economic system continues, it will collapse, and not in some far distant time. If you turn the whole thing over to a one world government, how would you consolidate all of the existing economic systems into one system that works for everyone?</p><p></p><p>The European Economic Union is going through some rough times now. The major problems have more to do with the internal economic struggles of the various nations, not necessarily the problems the USA causes for the rest of the world.</p><p></p><p>The USA foreign policy sucks. Internally, the federal government refuses to regulate the private banking / capitalist sharks who are in a feeding frenzy. Go look back at the history surrounding the 1920's era Great Depression. It didn't start with the Black Friday crash of the stock market. There was a whole lot of abuse permitted leading up to that crash. But the actual crash occurred over an extended period of time.</p><p></p><p>The same pattern is taking place today. The so-called "slow recovery" is not a recovery; it is a temporary easing of the pain. There is more pain to come, and just what form that takes has yet to be determined.</p><p></p><p>The stock market crash of the past was, however, a crash. It was the crash of capitalism. It failed, as it inevitably must due to human nature. It took FDR and the intervention of the federal government to turn the nation's economy around. FDR instituted necessary policies that regulated the capitalist markets quite heavily. He didn't do that because he was smart, because he wasn't all that smart; he didn't do it because he wanted to, he was a capitalist banker himself -- that's where his family got their money from. FDR was heavily involved in the looting of post-WW-1 Germany with many other of the rich folk in the USA.</p><p></p><p>FDR instituted the regulatory apparatus needed to "save" capitalism; to keep it going. Those who disliked those policies called him a traitor to his class. He chose to portray himself as the concerned father figure whose only desire was to ease the suffering of the common folk by creating federal jobs programs that put Americans back to work, and by starting the Social Security system. Neither of these represent what was actually taking place at the time. He was simply re-starting the economic engine that permits the well-to-do and the well-connected to bask in the wealth created by the labor of the common folk. Without those modifications of the previous economic system being instituted, the rebellion of the common folk that had been brewing for quite some time would have erupted into something that looked like the French Revolution of the late 18th century.</p><p></p><p>In today's economic doldrums, there is no FDR, and there is no push for change. The sharks have bought off the government; they're paying Congress and POTUS and SCOTUS to specifically avoid reinstituting the types of federal regulations they worked so hard to do away with over the last 30 - 40 years. Another big difference was have today is the presence of the national security state that was instituted during President Truman's administration. In the 65 or so years since that time, systems have been put into place to monitor the common folk and put down any rebellion before it can get out of hand and spread. When the shit hits the fan this time, it's going to be one big mess.</p><p></p><p>---</p><p></p><p>So anyway, getting away from my rant, how would such a one world government go about distributing resources in a just and fair manner?</p><p></p><p>The standard of living we used to enjoy here in the USA came at the expense of the wealth American capitalists basically stole from other parts of the world. That standard of living is being deliberately dismantled, but we still manage to enjoy our air conditioning, and TV's, and SUV's. Will you be willing to give those things up in exchange for a one world government?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wyldberi, post: 93978, member: 6095"] The big difference is what would you do about the population problem. I'm not an advocate for genocide, but there are an excess of human beings living on this planet. If the present economic system continues, it will collapse, and not in some far distant time. If you turn the whole thing over to a one world government, how would you consolidate all of the existing economic systems into one system that works for everyone? The European Economic Union is going through some rough times now. The major problems have more to do with the internal economic struggles of the various nations, not necessarily the problems the USA causes for the rest of the world. The USA foreign policy sucks. Internally, the federal government refuses to regulate the private banking / capitalist sharks who are in a feeding frenzy. Go look back at the history surrounding the 1920's era Great Depression. It didn't start with the Black Friday crash of the stock market. There was a whole lot of abuse permitted leading up to that crash. But the actual crash occurred over an extended period of time. The same pattern is taking place today. The so-called "slow recovery" is not a recovery; it is a temporary easing of the pain. There is more pain to come, and just what form that takes has yet to be determined. The stock market crash of the past was, however, a crash. It was the crash of capitalism. It failed, as it inevitably must due to human nature. It took FDR and the intervention of the federal government to turn the nation's economy around. FDR instituted necessary policies that regulated the capitalist markets quite heavily. He didn't do that because he was smart, because he wasn't all that smart; he didn't do it because he wanted to, he was a capitalist banker himself -- that's where his family got their money from. FDR was heavily involved in the looting of post-WW-1 Germany with many other of the rich folk in the USA. FDR instituted the regulatory apparatus needed to "save" capitalism; to keep it going. Those who disliked those policies called him a traitor to his class. He chose to portray himself as the concerned father figure whose only desire was to ease the suffering of the common folk by creating federal jobs programs that put Americans back to work, and by starting the Social Security system. Neither of these represent what was actually taking place at the time. He was simply re-starting the economic engine that permits the well-to-do and the well-connected to bask in the wealth created by the labor of the common folk. Without those modifications of the previous economic system being instituted, the rebellion of the common folk that had been brewing for quite some time would have erupted into something that looked like the French Revolution of the late 18th century. In today's economic doldrums, there is no FDR, and there is no push for change. The sharks have bought off the government; they're paying Congress and POTUS and SCOTUS to specifically avoid reinstituting the types of federal regulations they worked so hard to do away with over the last 30 - 40 years. Another big difference was have today is the presence of the national security state that was instituted during President Truman's administration. In the 65 or so years since that time, systems have been put into place to monitor the common folk and put down any rebellion before it can get out of hand and spread. When the shit hits the fan this time, it's going to be one big mess. --- So anyway, getting away from my rant, how would such a one world government go about distributing resources in a just and fair manner? The standard of living we used to enjoy here in the USA came at the expense of the wealth American capitalists basically stole from other parts of the world. That standard of living is being deliberately dismantled, but we still manage to enjoy our air conditioning, and TV's, and SUV's. Will you be willing to give those things up in exchange for a one world government? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Is a 1 World government really a bad thing?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top