Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor Debate (The Time Tunnel)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 58235" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>Apparently since you can't find any proof, you're making stuff up. Let's take a look at your statements so far:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I have been checking to see if Hawking made these statements. He didn't. Hawking worked out the math to show black holes evaporate. The smaller they get, the faster they evaporate. So a micro-singularity according to Hawking will disappear. So either you made your statement up or Titor did. Which is it? Why don't you post Titor's exact statement and we can then decide.</p><p> </p><p>Let's take a look at your next statement:</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I have already verified that Hawking didn't make these statements. In 2004 Hawking conceded a bet he had with Preskill over the information paradox. Hawking believed information was lost as a black hole evaporates, but Preskill believed information was conserved. The general consensus in the scientific community is that information is conserved. Hawking didn't verify this! All he did was concede his bet with Preskill. Thorne also has the same bet with Preskill, but has not conceded to yet. And to date, just math exists for the existence and evaporation of black holes. No actual black holes have been found.</p><p> </p><p>Now originally you state you are not talking about black holes. But a micro-singularity is a black hole. Come clean! Admit you're trying to pull a fast one on us all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 58235, member: 288"] Apparently since you can't find any proof, you're making stuff up. Let's take a look at your statements so far: I have been checking to see if Hawking made these statements. He didn't. Hawking worked out the math to show black holes evaporate. The smaller they get, the faster they evaporate. So a micro-singularity according to Hawking will disappear. So either you made your statement up or Titor did. Which is it? Why don't you post Titor's exact statement and we can then decide. Let's take a look at your next statement: I have already verified that Hawking didn't make these statements. In 2004 Hawking conceded a bet he had with Preskill over the information paradox. Hawking believed information was lost as a black hole evaporates, but Preskill believed information was conserved. The general consensus in the scientific community is that information is conserved. Hawking didn't verify this! All he did was concede his bet with Preskill. Thorne also has the same bet with Preskill, but has not conceded to yet. And to date, just math exists for the existence and evaporation of black holes. No actual black holes have been found. Now originally you state you are not talking about black holes. But a micro-singularity is a black hole. Come clean! Admit you're trying to pull a fast one on us all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor Debate (The Time Tunnel)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top