Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor = John Tooker?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sevensixtwo" data-source="post: 53942" data-attributes="member: 3162"><p>I have been working as a professional physicist since 2007. I was awarded the Presidential Fellowship by the School of Physics at Georgia Tech. This is the Institute's highest award given to incoming PhD candidates and I hope to receive that degree next year. I got my Masters in physics from Tech and graduated magna cum laude from GSU. I do not know what gravity probe B is, can you tell me? </p><p></p><p> It is strange to me that you say this geometry is unphysical as it is the well-known solution for a rotating charged black hole. It is said that there is no mechanism which could actually charge a black hole in a probabilisticly favorable way. We need to really examine that statement closely. The same argument which says a BH can't acquire net charge also says the atmosphere can't acquire a net charge. However, due to lightning, we know charge does accumulate. </p><p></p><p>Furthermore, John Titor explained how CERN was able to create micro-singularities and charge them for magnetic storage. This was the power source for his machine: the C204. The schematic shows something that looks pretty kooky. There's these three time fields that seemed not make sense until I wrote <a href="https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BxV2HFmw-aNMcjBqakZjY1NSaGU4WVVGZGJ6R3F4QQ" target="_blank">this</a>. I want to emphasize that I had seen these drawings as an undergraduate, but not understood them. Late last year I made a motion to publish my <a href="https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BxV2HFmw-aNMMjUxOGUzZTMtYmVlYi00NGFkLWE1ZTYtNjk1NTRjYjk2YjRi" target="_blank">solution to dark energy</a>. I was censored capriciously by arXiv. Then I stumbled upon a much more fundamental principle and have been trying to call attention to this for months. Since I share a name and research interests with "John Tooker" I have been looking into the time travel rumors recently. I saw this schematic and understood it as being governed by the principle illustrated in <a href="https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BxV2HFmw-aNMcjBqakZjY1NSaGU4WVVGZGJ6R3F4QQ" target="_blank">equations (11)</a>. In fact PamelaM, who was one of Titor's main corespondents, has an avatar that contains essential aspects of the new physics and even has an avatar color-coordinated with mine. Strange...</p><p><img src="http://i.imgur.com/IygWg.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sevensixtwo, post: 53942, member: 3162"] I have been working as a professional physicist since 2007. I was awarded the Presidential Fellowship by the School of Physics at Georgia Tech. This is the Institute's highest award given to incoming PhD candidates and I hope to receive that degree next year. I got my Masters in physics from Tech and graduated magna cum laude from GSU. I do not know what gravity probe B is, can you tell me? It is strange to me that you say this geometry is unphysical as it is the well-known solution for a rotating charged black hole. It is said that there is no mechanism which could actually charge a black hole in a probabilisticly favorable way. We need to really examine that statement closely. The same argument which says a BH can't acquire net charge also says the atmosphere can't acquire a net charge. However, due to lightning, we know charge does accumulate. Furthermore, John Titor explained how CERN was able to create micro-singularities and charge them for magnetic storage. This was the power source for his machine: the C204. The schematic shows something that looks pretty kooky. There's these three time fields that seemed not make sense until I wrote [URL='https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BxV2HFmw-aNMcjBqakZjY1NSaGU4WVVGZGJ6R3F4QQ']this[/URL]. I want to emphasize that I had seen these drawings as an undergraduate, but not understood them. Late last year I made a motion to publish my [URL='https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BxV2HFmw-aNMMjUxOGUzZTMtYmVlYi00NGFkLWE1ZTYtNjk1NTRjYjk2YjRi']solution to dark energy[/URL]. I was censored capriciously by arXiv. Then I stumbled upon a much more fundamental principle and have been trying to call attention to this for months. Since I share a name and research interests with "John Tooker" I have been looking into the time travel rumors recently. I saw this schematic and understood it as being governed by the principle illustrated in [URL='https://docs.google.com/open?id=0BxV2HFmw-aNMcjBqakZjY1NSaGU4WVVGZGJ6R3F4QQ']equations (11)[/URL]. In fact PamelaM, who was one of Titor's main corespondents, has an avatar that contains essential aspects of the new physics and even has an avatar color-coordinated with mine. Strange... [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/IygWg.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor = John Tooker?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top