Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor: Real Time Traveler or a Hoaxer?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mudpuppy" data-source="post: 29277" data-attributes="member: 134"><p><strong>Re: John Titor Debate!</strong></p><p></p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"pauli\")</div></p><p> </p><p>Iteresting article Pauli. Doesn't the above statement seem eerily similar to Karl Marx's "Religion is the opiate for the masses"? Of course, nowadays, I think television and the internet come in as a close second to religion as being an opiate.</p><p></p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Apogee\")</div></p><p> </p><p>Hi Apogee,</p><p> Well, not being one to argue over the cookiness of Adamski, I don't think you can really compare him to Titor. Yes, there is a sucker born every minute....but does that mean that we compare Heaven's Gate to the yet to appear Second Coming of Christ as an elaborate hoax perpetrated by the Christian church for profit, power, etc...? (no, I'm not saying that...I'm just using it as an illustration). Adamski being a crackpot doesn't necessarily imply that Titor is a crackpot. Is it a story with some holes? Yep. But the bible (Old and New Testament) has holes. The Koran has holes. The first landing of man on the moon has holes. Alot of things has holes. We are right to question but not very bright to always throw the baby out with the bathwater. Quatum Phyics is always changing. What we don't understand about Titor's story today may be understood in a year from now as Cern makes new discoveries, other scientists making decision reversals the way Hawking did, perhaps, Tippler coming out of the closet about a few things.....whose to say. I'm sure Galileo was thought a crackpot when first challenging Aritstole's views......Marconi for "inventing" radio waves in his mind that others could not see,....Tesla for his inventions.....an on and on....you see, the history books are also full of so-called "crackpots" whose futuristic visions changed our world. Where would we be now without those "crackpots?"</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mudpuppy, post: 29277, member: 134"] [b]Re: John Titor Debate![/b] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"pauli\")</div> Iteresting article Pauli. Doesn't the above statement seem eerily similar to Karl Marx's "Religion is the opiate for the masses"? Of course, nowadays, I think television and the internet come in as a close second to religion as being an opiate. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Apogee\")</div> Hi Apogee, Well, not being one to argue over the cookiness of Adamski, I don't think you can really compare him to Titor. Yes, there is a sucker born every minute....but does that mean that we compare Heaven's Gate to the yet to appear Second Coming of Christ as an elaborate hoax perpetrated by the Christian church for profit, power, etc...? (no, I'm not saying that...I'm just using it as an illustration). Adamski being a crackpot doesn't necessarily imply that Titor is a crackpot. Is it a story with some holes? Yep. But the bible (Old and New Testament) has holes. The Koran has holes. The first landing of man on the moon has holes. Alot of things has holes. We are right to question but not very bright to always throw the baby out with the bathwater. Quatum Phyics is always changing. What we don't understand about Titor's story today may be understood in a year from now as Cern makes new discoveries, other scientists making decision reversals the way Hawking did, perhaps, Tippler coming out of the closet about a few things.....whose to say. I'm sure Galileo was thought a crackpot when first challenging Aritstole's views......Marconi for "inventing" radio waves in his mind that others could not see,....Tesla for his inventions.....an on and on....you see, the history books are also full of so-called "crackpots" whose futuristic visions changed our world. Where would we be now without those "crackpots?" [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor: Real Time Traveler or a Hoaxer?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top