Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor's legitimacy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="temporal recon" data-source="post: 132974" data-attributes="member: 2826"><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">The title of this thread is, as you claim, the question that I dare say the entire Titor fandom has been asking since 2000 : "Is John Titor Real?" </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">To say that I am disappointed that this question remains a topic of discussion would be an understatement. This question has been asked and answered ad infinitum. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Does this forum's curiosity and creative, objective thinking extend to this question only? Have we not progressed beyond this very boring question into truly wondrous and complex questions (As Japrim rightly states)? Very encouraged to see Japrim's efforts to separate the wheat from the chaff here, unfortunately it appears his efforts fall on deaf ears.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">In the course of the discussion on this thread, Einstein (von Paranormalis) presented his theory as fact. His hubris was so egregious that I was forced to comment. In the course of this exploration of his deception, the fact that others came to his defense was also disappointing.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Why defend a known deceiver; a deceiver whose entire premise is based on a false/mistaken understanding of gravity's effect on massless objects?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Is it possible we bet on the wrong horse?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Where is this forum's desire for </span><em><span style="font-size: 15px">actual truth? </span></em><span style="font-size: 15px">Where is this forum's desire to remain free from the forces that act to thwart this Truth? Instead, those forces are </span><em><span style="font-size: 15px">defended, </span></em><span style="font-size: 15px">unwittingly, by the well-intentioned. </span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">To further explore the laser pen question with, seemingly, the only individual actually <em>participating</em> in a relevant question:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Why do you believe the light would bend at the mid point between the inner event horizon and the outer event horizon, still within the ergo sphere where the effects of the gravity well are avoided or minimized? </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">As Ever</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Temporal Recon</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="temporal recon, post: 132974, member: 2826"] [SIZE=4] The title of this thread is, as you claim, the question that I dare say the entire Titor fandom has been asking since 2000 : "Is John Titor Real?" To say that I am disappointed that this question remains a topic of discussion would be an understatement. This question has been asked and answered ad infinitum. Does this forum's curiosity and creative, objective thinking extend to this question only? Have we not progressed beyond this very boring question into truly wondrous and complex questions (As Japrim rightly states)? Very encouraged to see Japrim's efforts to separate the wheat from the chaff here, unfortunately it appears his efforts fall on deaf ears. In the course of the discussion on this thread, Einstein (von Paranormalis) presented his theory as fact. His hubris was so egregious that I was forced to comment. In the course of this exploration of his deception, the fact that others came to his defense was also disappointing. Why defend a known deceiver; a deceiver whose entire premise is based on a false/mistaken understanding of gravity's effect on massless objects? Is it possible we bet on the wrong horse? Where is this forum's desire for [/SIZE][I][SIZE=4]actual truth? [/SIZE][/I][SIZE=4]Where is this forum's desire to remain free from the forces that act to thwart this Truth? Instead, those forces are [/SIZE][I][SIZE=4]defended, [/SIZE][/I][SIZE=4]unwittingly, by the well-intentioned. [/SIZE] [SIZE=4]To further explore the laser pen question with, seemingly, the only individual actually [I]participating[/I] in a relevant question: Why do you believe the light would bend at the mid point between the inner event horizon and the outer event horizon, still within the ergo sphere where the effects of the gravity well are avoided or minimized? As Ever Temporal Recon [/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor's legitimacy?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top