Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor's legitimacy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PaulaJedi" data-source="post: 132987" data-attributes="member: 4272"><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">I see some assumptions here. Are we assuming that what the individual is holding in the photograph is a microsingularity? In that case, yes, your theory is valid.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><em>"Unlike an <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_(optics)" target="_blank">optical lens</a>, a gravitational lens bends light to the maximum closest to its center and to a minimum furthest from its center. Consequently, a gravitational lens has no single <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_(optics)" target="_blank">focal point</a>, but a focal line instead. If the (light) source, the massive lensing object, and the observer lie in a straight line, the original light source will appear as a ring around the massive lensing object. If there is any misalignment the observer will see an arc segment instead. "</em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">This would explain the arc, however, how can we ASSUME that the person in the photo is holding a singularity? Where's the evidence?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">If it is different technology, then the event horizon is irrelevant.</span></p><p></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">I see hundreds of topics on this forum. You chose to respond to this one</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">Please supply evidence that everything you say is "truth". </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px">If the truth is irrational and ugly, oppositional, and insulting, then it will be rebelled against. Example: Government. We know the truth. In a nutshell, it sux. Why should we embrace it? Like I said before, if a time traveler is a jerk, I don't want anything to do with him. I don't care who he is at that point. And if people WANT to discuss this photograph, it's their right. People come to these forums at different stages of the story. Some people were just introduced to John Titor, so they will ask questions that have been asked before. I see no harm in discussing it with them. I see no need to send out the topic police. Besides, you're talking here, so, it must be a topic of interest to you.</span></p><p></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 15px"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PaulaJedi, post: 132987, member: 4272"] [SIZE=4] I see some assumptions here. Are we assuming that what the individual is holding in the photograph is a microsingularity? In that case, yes, your theory is valid. [I]"Unlike an [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_(optics)']optical lens[/URL], a gravitational lens bends light to the maximum closest to its center and to a minimum furthest from its center. Consequently, a gravitational lens has no single [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_(optics)']focal point[/URL], but a focal line instead. If the (light) source, the massive lensing object, and the observer lie in a straight line, the original light source will appear as a ring around the massive lensing object. If there is any misalignment the observer will see an arc segment instead. "[/I] This would explain the arc, however, how can we ASSUME that the person in the photo is holding a singularity? Where's the evidence? If it is different technology, then the event horizon is irrelevant.[/SIZE] [SIZE=4] I see hundreds of topics on this forum. You chose to respond to this one [/SIZE][I][SIZE=4][/SIZE][/I] [SIZE=4]Please supply evidence that everything you say is "truth". [/SIZE] [SIZE=4] If the truth is irrational and ugly, oppositional, and insulting, then it will be rebelled against. Example: Government. We know the truth. In a nutshell, it sux. Why should we embrace it? Like I said before, if a time traveler is a jerk, I don't want anything to do with him. I don't care who he is at that point. And if people WANT to discuss this photograph, it's their right. People come to these forums at different stages of the story. Some people were just introduced to John Titor, so they will ask questions that have been asked before. I see no harm in discussing it with them. I see no need to send out the topic police. Besides, you're talking here, so, it must be a topic of interest to you.[/SIZE] [SIZE=4] [/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor's legitimacy?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top