vodkafan
Junior Member
- Messages
- 99
if JT is/was/will be a time traveller there is no reason why he could not come back BEFORE he was here last time.
It doesn't matter if the time has passed. He could still come back in 1969 or 1949. Even if he is physically older than he was the first time he came (1975?) That's what time travel is. I have been thinking about this a lot. Once somebody starts travelling in time very quickly the only thing that will become important is his/her own PERSONAL time. His body will still age the same , he will have his 70 odd years the same as everybody. He will still need to sleep 8 hours a day and eat at regular times. The difference is that for us we are fixed in our 70 years. A time traveller can spread his 70 years over (just for instance ) a THOUSAND years and can go backwards and forwards. For instance a weeks holiday in 1805 . a year in 1920 while going to a disco in 1976 once a week just for the fun of it. There are no limits. And maybe if he lives to be 90 or something he might want to go back and die happy and peacefully on an Indian reservation in 1860. Do you get it? His BEFORE doesn't have to be in the same order as our BEFORE. He is free.
Why does he not do this and bring some sort of proof?
It doesn't matter if the time has passed. He could still come back in 1969 or 1949. Even if he is physically older than he was the first time he came (1975?) That's what time travel is. I have been thinking about this a lot. Once somebody starts travelling in time very quickly the only thing that will become important is his/her own PERSONAL time. His body will still age the same , he will have his 70 odd years the same as everybody. He will still need to sleep 8 hours a day and eat at regular times. The difference is that for us we are fixed in our 70 years. A time traveller can spread his 70 years over (just for instance ) a THOUSAND years and can go backwards and forwards. For instance a weeks holiday in 1805 . a year in 1920 while going to a disco in 1976 once a week just for the fun of it. There are no limits. And maybe if he lives to be 90 or something he might want to go back and die happy and peacefully on an Indian reservation in 1860. Do you get it? His BEFORE doesn't have to be in the same order as our BEFORE. He is free.
Why does he not do this and bring some sort of proof?