Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Kay Titor 177 Tempus Edax Rerum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dh1" data-source="post: 149458" data-attributes="member: 2831"><p>My research is almost exclusively upon the technology. However those who describe tech like this in some degree if they correlate with what I've found and replicated I usually find the rest of their info to be legitimate. Most people in these fields of research really don't take the technical-science info seriously to do due diligence upon it. Takes years.</p><p></p><p>So we have Gibbs recounting he met john titor and Gibbs tech works.</p><p></p><p>There's enough tech info to build time machines from several sources. This is what people disregard too quickly.</p><p></p><p>I found Titor's device description and operation to be legit but I only focused upon his technical info, nothing else. If I duplicated his blackholes would that validate him? He didn't reveal enough info to replicate his device but several other scientists fill in the gaps. They don't know it yet though. </p><p></p><p>Any thoughts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dh1, post: 149458, member: 2831"] My research is almost exclusively upon the technology. However those who describe tech like this in some degree if they correlate with what I've found and replicated I usually find the rest of their info to be legitimate. Most people in these fields of research really don't take the technical-science info seriously to do due diligence upon it. Takes years. So we have Gibbs recounting he met john titor and Gibbs tech works. There's enough tech info to build time machines from several sources. This is what people disregard too quickly. I found Titor's device description and operation to be legit but I only focused upon his technical info, nothing else. If I duplicated his blackholes would that validate him? He didn't reveal enough info to replicate his device but several other scientists fill in the gaps. They don't know it yet though. Any thoughts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Kay Titor 177 Tempus Edax Rerum
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top