Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Political Exchange
Labour Leader REFUSES to Answer Interviewer About, What Is A Woman!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="alpha centauri" data-source="post: 230673" data-attributes="member: 8464"><p>As far as I know, these political divides are intentfully caused to separate the population. Divide and conquer.</p><p></p><p>A lot of these problems could be easily solved, but I think they dont want it. And both political sides fall for the planned division, especially in the USA, but also everywhere else.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I dont know why they dont see the solution. Either they dont understand it or they want to misunderstand it for political power.</p><p>The transgender female have and unfair advantage and what they always forgot to mention that the transgender males have an unfair disadvantage. Strangly enough, that they do not complain about the disadvantage of transgender males, they think it is transphobic to complain about the disadvantage of females in comparison to transgender females. But with the same logic they are transphobic, too. They are just transphobic to transgender males.</p><p></p><p>When a female is third in the world and wants to transition to a man than this female should be third in the male category after the transition. But they have zero chance to be as good as they were as females and they dont care about them. Furthermore, you could also give the transgender females a disadvantage, so they also have no chance to win like this is the case with the transgender males and the issue would be solved.</p><p></p><p>And the other problem could also be easily solved: You have to put and extra dressing cabin into the dressing room or use only dressing cabins and the problem would be solved. You could do the same with showers. you have to use closed showers, but that costs money.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="alpha centauri, post: 230673, member: 8464"] As far as I know, these political divides are intentfully caused to separate the population. Divide and conquer. A lot of these problems could be easily solved, but I think they dont want it. And both political sides fall for the planned division, especially in the USA, but also everywhere else. I dont know why they dont see the solution. Either they dont understand it or they want to misunderstand it for political power. The transgender female have and unfair advantage and what they always forgot to mention that the transgender males have an unfair disadvantage. Strangly enough, that they do not complain about the disadvantage of transgender males, they think it is transphobic to complain about the disadvantage of females in comparison to transgender females. But with the same logic they are transphobic, too. They are just transphobic to transgender males. When a female is third in the world and wants to transition to a man than this female should be third in the male category after the transition. But they have zero chance to be as good as they were as females and they dont care about them. Furthermore, you could also give the transgender females a disadvantage, so they also have no chance to win like this is the case with the transgender males and the issue would be solved. And the other problem could also be easily solved: You have to put and extra dressing cabin into the dressing room or use only dressing cabins and the problem would be solved. You could do the same with showers. you have to use closed showers, but that costs money. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Political Exchange
Labour Leader REFUSES to Answer Interviewer About, What Is A Woman!!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top