Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Cryptozoology & Mythical Beings
Mermaids the Physical proof.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Samstwitch" data-source="post: 69945" data-attributes="member: 2770"><p>Yes, I thought about that too. I noticed it. Except it doesn't work for Dr. Paul Robertson, the main interviewee in the films. In the first documentary, Dr. Robertson has a short beard and trimmed reddish hair. In the 2nd documentary, his hair is longer and disheveled, untrimmed. In the 2nd film it's very obvious that he's nervous about being filmed. This isn't obvious in the first film. In the 2nd film, he's sitting at a table, while the host to his left talks. He isn't actually interviewed until half way through the film or more. During the wait time, the camera still has him in frame. That's when you can see that he's nervous and later when he actually talks he is somewhat nervous.</p><p> </p><p>In the first film, he's directly in front of the camera talking, so he doesn't come across as nervous, because he's focused on the subject. But it's a whole different story in the 2nd film. My point is that it's obvious in the 2nd film that he's no actor. In the first film, he's focused on the story. In the 2nd film, he has to wait and he's apprehensive about being on camera, as any non-professional actor would be. Also, it's obvious in the 2nd documentary that his dialogue is not scripted...it's more obvious that he's not an actor.</p><p> </p><p>(When I reference the first and 2nd documentaries, I'm talking about the two that aired on TV that I listed earlier. I didn't get to post any videos from the 2nd documentary on this thread, as it's not yet available on Youtube.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Samstwitch, post: 69945, member: 2770"] Yes, I thought about that too. I noticed it. Except it doesn't work for Dr. Paul Robertson, the main interviewee in the films. In the first documentary, Dr. Robertson has a short beard and trimmed reddish hair. In the 2nd documentary, his hair is longer and disheveled, untrimmed. In the 2nd film it's very obvious that he's nervous about being filmed. This isn't obvious in the first film. In the 2nd film, he's sitting at a table, while the host to his left talks. He isn't actually interviewed until half way through the film or more. During the wait time, the camera still has him in frame. That's when you can see that he's nervous and later when he actually talks he is somewhat nervous. In the first film, he's directly in front of the camera talking, so he doesn't come across as nervous, because he's focused on the subject. But it's a whole different story in the 2nd film. My point is that it's obvious in the 2nd film that he's no actor. In the first film, he's focused on the story. In the 2nd film, he has to wait and he's apprehensive about being on camera, as any non-professional actor would be. Also, it's obvious in the 2nd documentary that his dialogue is not scripted...it's more obvious that he's not an actor. (When I reference the first and 2nd documentaries, I'm talking about the two that aired on TV that I listed earlier. I didn't get to post any videos from the 2nd documentary on this thread, as it's not yet available on Youtube.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Cryptozoology & Mythical Beings
Mermaids the Physical proof.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top