Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Miscellaneous Chatter on anything Government related: Coverups, Conspiracies, Corruption, etc
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justinian" data-source="post: 74253" data-attributes="member: 923"><p>Uggghhh.. Perhaps I'm not getting the right message across with what I'm typing. It happens. </p><p>@ Sam: yes, I was typing about #2 definition. agressively active without physical confrontation.</p><p>@[USER=2880]Khaos[/USER]: yes it was a typo, but no I'm not an advocate for censorship, I'm just an advocate for not thinking about things one sided all the time. </p><p>@ Paula: Thanks for clarifying. I am sorry if I took your replies wrong, but your words were seemingly angry when I was reading them. </p><p>@Octavius: I agree it has to be this way, but some of the replies.. well, read my reply to Paula. </p><p></p><p>Perhaps let me put this into an example:</p><p>-Pedophiles like child pornography. Yet child pornography is illegal to have. This is a form of censorship. If what all of you are saying is true, then child pornography should be allowed to be had by everyone without being illegal. I'm sorry, but I'm okay with that being censored. You cannot say you want free flow of all information and then block something because you think it is morally wrong. Because that's how the governments think, that gets censorship started in the first place.</p><p>-My bank account information is blocked by the Privacy Act. Without a form of censorship that would not exist and the bank managers would be able to freely email my information around the web, opening me up to have my account hacked. </p><p>- I'll give you a personal one that really hits home for me: Facebook postings; (for right or wrong) One base I was at in Baghdad was hit hard one night and a lot of people died because somebody posted to Facebook details that their whole unit was at the airport waiting to leave. A lot of people died that night because one person couldn't keep their mouth shut for 2 hours until they got on the plane. Did they shoot there a lot? yes. But that particular night they knew there was a large concentration of troops gathered and used it to their advantage. I understand it's war. But they were all under orders to not post locations or times. This person thought they were the exception because the have the right as an American of the Freedom of Speech, but they died for it that night along with a lot of other people. Then they posted videos on the internet laughing about it while they drove around our base firing the rockets in that were killing everyone. </p><p>-Another free flow of information at the end of the last one there. Posting videos of killing people. You'd have to allow that. </p><p></p><p>-There is no such thing as being truly free. There is no country in the world where it's citizens are free to do as they so choose. We have more freedoms in this country than 95% of the world. The countries that have more freedoms than us, do so because they are basically in anarchy. And that is not a state I'd like to live in. There is a good way and a bad way to effect change. </p><p>-My point being the above. You cannot call some information grey areas, you cannot say exceptions.</p><p>You cannot say free flow of information, then go back and say that there are exceptions, because then we go right back to square one.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justinian, post: 74253, member: 923"] Uggghhh.. Perhaps I'm not getting the right message across with what I'm typing. It happens. @ Sam: yes, I was typing about #2 definition. agressively active without physical confrontation. @[USER=2880]Khaos[/USER]: yes it was a typo, but no I'm not an advocate for censorship, I'm just an advocate for not thinking about things one sided all the time. @ Paula: Thanks for clarifying. I am sorry if I took your replies wrong, but your words were seemingly angry when I was reading them. @Octavius: I agree it has to be this way, but some of the replies.. well, read my reply to Paula. Perhaps let me put this into an example: -Pedophiles like child pornography. Yet child pornography is illegal to have. This is a form of censorship. If what all of you are saying is true, then child pornography should be allowed to be had by everyone without being illegal. I'm sorry, but I'm okay with that being censored. You cannot say you want free flow of all information and then block something because you think it is morally wrong. Because that's how the governments think, that gets censorship started in the first place. -My bank account information is blocked by the Privacy Act. Without a form of censorship that would not exist and the bank managers would be able to freely email my information around the web, opening me up to have my account hacked. - I'll give you a personal one that really hits home for me: Facebook postings; (for right or wrong) One base I was at in Baghdad was hit hard one night and a lot of people died because somebody posted to Facebook details that their whole unit was at the airport waiting to leave. A lot of people died that night because one person couldn't keep their mouth shut for 2 hours until they got on the plane. Did they shoot there a lot? yes. But that particular night they knew there was a large concentration of troops gathered and used it to their advantage. I understand it's war. But they were all under orders to not post locations or times. This person thought they were the exception because the have the right as an American of the Freedom of Speech, but they died for it that night along with a lot of other people. Then they posted videos on the internet laughing about it while they drove around our base firing the rockets in that were killing everyone. -Another free flow of information at the end of the last one there. Posting videos of killing people. You'd have to allow that. -There is no such thing as being truly free. There is no country in the world where it's citizens are free to do as they so choose. We have more freedoms in this country than 95% of the world. The countries that have more freedoms than us, do so because they are basically in anarchy. And that is not a state I'd like to live in. There is a good way and a bad way to effect change. -My point being the above. You cannot call some information grey areas, you cannot say exceptions. You cannot say free flow of information, then go back and say that there are exceptions, because then we go right back to square one. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Miscellaneous Chatter on anything Government related: Coverups, Conspiracies, Corruption, etc
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top