Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
Qronos 1
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dulux" data-source="post: 52973" data-attributes="member: 3094"><p>90% Authenticity Reasoning Method - there's nothing else to call it.</p><p>It's the discription of the reasoning your average Jury goes through to find a verdict. Basically, if you run all the evidence of any subject through a matching game to see how all the pieces fit together, the balance of guilty or not guilty sways to the correct side. BUT it's only 90% of the process. Technically, having a "judge" in the proceeding, would make it 100%</p><p> </p><p>In this case, you want to match dates of past events to the predictions to see what has and hasn't come true all together on a chart. This way you can get a really good look at whether or not the claims hold "weight."</p><p> </p><p>You won't find 90%ARM online, there's just no term for it at all besides "jury reasoning." The 90%ARM is a term used for political reasons.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dulux, post: 52973, member: 3094"] 90% Authenticity Reasoning Method - there's nothing else to call it. It's the discription of the reasoning your average Jury goes through to find a verdict. Basically, if you run all the evidence of any subject through a matching game to see how all the pieces fit together, the balance of guilty or not guilty sways to the correct side. BUT it's only 90% of the process. Technically, having a "judge" in the proceeding, would make it 100% In this case, you want to match dates of past events to the predictions to see what has and hasn't come true all together on a chart. This way you can get a really good look at whether or not the claims hold "weight." You won't find 90%ARM online, there's just no term for it at all besides "jury reasoning." The 90%ARM is a term used for political reasons. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
Qronos 1
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top