Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
"Something Is Seriously Wrong - Too Many Strong Earthquakes"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Octavusprime" data-source="post: 53168" data-attributes="member: 3091"><p>More dense does not necessarily mean more stable. New buildings and bridges in earthquake zones are becoming more and more flexible. Rigid is bad when it comes to earthquake proofing structures. The same concept would apply to underground stability. </p><p></p><p>Another issue with water is its lower boiling point than oil. In high heat systems water would vaporize and cause increased erosion of rock and fissures could form in places not normally associated with such things.</p><p></p><p>I'm not claiming to hold the answers but when substances as different as water and oil are substituted for each other in a highly dynamic system without study who knows what is taking place.</p><p></p><p>For every action there is a reaction. I hope I'm wrong and this doesn't effect anything but one thing that nature has proven to me is that the most seemingly insignificant changes can have huge impacts on systems. The internal functions of the earths core and crust is a not a system I want to throw out of balance. It took billions of years the get to this goldilock stage in earths timeline, could only take a few hundred years to destroy it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Octavusprime, post: 53168, member: 3091"] More dense does not necessarily mean more stable. New buildings and bridges in earthquake zones are becoming more and more flexible. Rigid is bad when it comes to earthquake proofing structures. The same concept would apply to underground stability. Another issue with water is its lower boiling point than oil. In high heat systems water would vaporize and cause increased erosion of rock and fissures could form in places not normally associated with such things. I'm not claiming to hold the answers but when substances as different as water and oil are substituted for each other in a highly dynamic system without study who knows what is taking place. For every action there is a reaction. I hope I'm wrong and this doesn't effect anything but one thing that nature has proven to me is that the most seemingly insignificant changes can have huge impacts on systems. The internal functions of the earths core and crust is a not a system I want to throw out of balance. It took billions of years the get to this goldilock stage in earths timeline, could only take a few hundred years to destroy it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
"Something Is Seriously Wrong - Too Many Strong Earthquakes"
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top