Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Terror in the Skies, Again?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CaryP" data-source="post: 6267" data-attributes="member: 34"><p><strong>Terror in the Skies, Again?</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Pyro,</p><p></p><p>Neither I nor the snopes.com piece said the Syrians were NOT on the plane. The snopes.com piece even said that the events sighted by the article "did occur (more or less)" but "her (the author of the article) interpretation of them (that they involved a group of terrorists making a dry run for building a bomb in-flight) was erroneous." "The men she observed on her flight were exactly what authorities told her they were: a group of Syrian musicians who had been hired to play at the Sycuan Casino & Resort near San Diego. Like any other group of passengers, the men in musical ensemble talked to each other, moved around, ate food, and used the restrooms while the flight was in progress. " That's all nothing more, nothing less. According to the snopes.com piece these guys really turned out to be Syrian musicians and the author of the article misinterpreted events witnessed by others on the plane. With all the terror warnings we've been getting from various components of the government, people are probably just a bit "edgey" and prone to looking for the "bad guys," especially if they are Arab looking. Just my opinion. </p><p></p><p>I'm not saying there aren't "bad guys" out there who mean us harm. Whether they're ultimately controlled by the CIA and the PTB, or they're just radical jihadists doesn't really matter. We're being prepared for a hit(s) in either case. So it's best to remain vigilent and prepared. An attack is an attack, no matter who's in control of those executing one.</p><p></p><p>Peace and chains (another departing expression from my 25 yr. old daughter)</p><p></p><p>Cary</p><p></p><p>P.S. (edit)</p><p></p><p></p><p>You rascal you. You beat me in response time. :lol: The President is the Commander in Chief in war or peace time. Congress did not pass an actual Act of War. They merely passed funding for Bush's military escapades. An officeal Act of War has more dire consequences in terms of power given to the Commander in Chief aka the President. Paul could probably enlighten us all on this matter. Paul?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CaryP, post: 6267, member: 34"] [b]Terror in the Skies, Again?[/b] Pyro, Neither I nor the snopes.com piece said the Syrians were NOT on the plane. The snopes.com piece even said that the events sighted by the article "did occur (more or less)" but "her (the author of the article) interpretation of them (that they involved a group of terrorists making a dry run for building a bomb in-flight) was erroneous." "The men she observed on her flight were exactly what authorities told her they were: a group of Syrian musicians who had been hired to play at the Sycuan Casino & Resort near San Diego. Like any other group of passengers, the men in musical ensemble talked to each other, moved around, ate food, and used the restrooms while the flight was in progress. " That's all nothing more, nothing less. According to the snopes.com piece these guys really turned out to be Syrian musicians and the author of the article misinterpreted events witnessed by others on the plane. With all the terror warnings we've been getting from various components of the government, people are probably just a bit "edgey" and prone to looking for the "bad guys," especially if they are Arab looking. Just my opinion. I'm not saying there aren't "bad guys" out there who mean us harm. Whether they're ultimately controlled by the CIA and the PTB, or they're just radical jihadists doesn't really matter. We're being prepared for a hit(s) in either case. So it's best to remain vigilent and prepared. An attack is an attack, no matter who's in control of those executing one. Peace and chains (another departing expression from my 25 yr. old daughter) Cary P.S. (edit) You rascal you. You beat me in response time. :lol: The President is the Commander in Chief in war or peace time. Congress did not pass an actual Act of War. They merely passed funding for Bush's military escapades. An officeal Act of War has more dire consequences in terms of power given to the Commander in Chief aka the President. Paul could probably enlighten us all on this matter. Paul? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Terror in the Skies, Again?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top