Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Terror in the Skies, Again?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 6268" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>Terror in the Skies, Again?</strong></p><p></p><p>A massive crime was committed; the correct characterization of what happened, in fact and law, was over 3,000 counts of first degree (aggravated; premeditated, etc.) murder. No nation attacked; the criminals perished in the attack.</p><p></p><p>Contrast the event with the attack on Pearl Harbor, Dec. 7, 1941. A similar surprise attack, but by a foreign sovereign nation, by its military, with the overwhelming number of casualties servicemen. Clearly an act of war, in which one country proceeds against the military of another. On the following day, the president asked for a formal declaration of war from Congress. Soon after, war was declared on the allies of Japan as well. Congress voted appropriations for defense and instigated the draft.</p><p></p><p>By law, hostilities would not terminate with Japan until a presdential decree to that effect in 1951.</p><p></p><p>Calling a monstrous criminal attack an act of war does not make it one, but the president immediately began to invoke the presidential war powers, and Congress, by its acquiescence (technically, Congress did this by voting for funding for the war), has permitted the president to proceed just as though war had been declared. </p><p></p><p>What the United States is now doing is waging war against any nation the president deems is a threat, and so he must link each invaded nation to terrorism to justify the public expenditure. So long as he does, he may continue to invoke the war powers and send troops into combat anywhere in the world.</p><p></p><p>I mean anywhere. Under the present conditions, he might tomorrow order the military into North Korea, Iran, Libya, Syria... China? Why not. Anybody got an "oppressive regime?"</p><p></p><p>There is no war in the traditional and technical sense; that is why he keeps saying, over and over and over again, that we are at war. There is no enemy nation unless we invade it and make it one. No nation on earth considers itself at this moment at war with the United States. We are apparently at war with everyone and anyone, including ourselves.</p><p></p><p>I will repeat this.</p><p></p><p>We are not at war just because President Bush says we are, or just because Congress votes the money for him to pretend to be at war.</p><p></p><p>Since we keep saying we are at war, and have it financed, we are technically and legally at war with everyone and anyone including ourselves.</p><p></p><p><strong>No nation on earth considers itself at this moment at war with the United States.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 6268, member: 42"] [b]Terror in the Skies, Again?[/b] A massive crime was committed; the correct characterization of what happened, in fact and law, was over 3,000 counts of first degree (aggravated; premeditated, etc.) murder. No nation attacked; the criminals perished in the attack. Contrast the event with the attack on Pearl Harbor, Dec. 7, 1941. A similar surprise attack, but by a foreign sovereign nation, by its military, with the overwhelming number of casualties servicemen. Clearly an act of war, in which one country proceeds against the military of another. On the following day, the president asked for a formal declaration of war from Congress. Soon after, war was declared on the allies of Japan as well. Congress voted appropriations for defense and instigated the draft. By law, hostilities would not terminate with Japan until a presdential decree to that effect in 1951. Calling a monstrous criminal attack an act of war does not make it one, but the president immediately began to invoke the presidential war powers, and Congress, by its acquiescence (technically, Congress did this by voting for funding for the war), has permitted the president to proceed just as though war had been declared. What the United States is now doing is waging war against any nation the president deems is a threat, and so he must link each invaded nation to terrorism to justify the public expenditure. So long as he does, he may continue to invoke the war powers and send troops into combat anywhere in the world. I mean anywhere. Under the present conditions, he might tomorrow order the military into North Korea, Iran, Libya, Syria... China? Why not. Anybody got an "oppressive regime?" There is no war in the traditional and technical sense; that is why he keeps saying, over and over and over again, that we are at war. There is no enemy nation unless we invade it and make it one. No nation on earth considers itself at this moment at war with the United States. We are apparently at war with everyone and anyone, including ourselves. I will repeat this. We are not at war just because President Bush says we are, or just because Congress votes the money for him to pretend to be at war. Since we keep saying we are at war, and have it financed, we are technically and legally at war with everyone and anyone including ourselves. [b]No nation on earth considers itself at this moment at war with the United States.[/b] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Terror in the Skies, Again?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top