Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Terror in the Skies, Again?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 6273" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>Terror in the Skies, Again?</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You can see the problems that arise when and if the United States can be deemed officially at war with whatever nation declares as much. We did not invade and conquer Iraq because of anything Saddam said along those lines, anyway. For one thing, he is a liar, and it was not true that we were at war with him. Hatred of the United States, likewise, is not a basis for declaring that a state of war exists between us and the hating nation.</p><p></p><p>The "enemy" is so difficult to find because he is a criminal-- it is a criminal syndicate. What, you think that just because the object isn't profit that it isn't organized crime? Al Queda meets the definition of a racketeering outfit under the federal RICO statutes. </p><p></p><p>In the traditional legal understanding of the term, no state of war exists at present between the United States and any foreign nation. When the United States invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, just as when it bombed Libyans and Yugoslavians and invaded Panama and Grenada, no state of war existed between it and any nation-- until, of course, the wars began, with unilateral American belligerence.</p><p></p><p>American conduct in these matters is indefensible. On the very afternoon of 9/11, Rumsfeld declared to his cohorts that we ought to attack Saddam. For weapons of mass destruction or for harboring terrorists? Then why did we wait to be attacked? Why did we wait months to hit Afghanistan, and years to hit Iraq? All indefensible. The rest of the world laughs at our disingenuous rationale, and it is a day of great shame for America.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 6273, member: 42"] [b]Terror in the Skies, Again?[/b] You can see the problems that arise when and if the United States can be deemed officially at war with whatever nation declares as much. We did not invade and conquer Iraq because of anything Saddam said along those lines, anyway. For one thing, he is a liar, and it was not true that we were at war with him. Hatred of the United States, likewise, is not a basis for declaring that a state of war exists between us and the hating nation. The "enemy" is so difficult to find because he is a criminal-- it is a criminal syndicate. What, you think that just because the object isn't profit that it isn't organized crime? Al Queda meets the definition of a racketeering outfit under the federal RICO statutes. In the traditional legal understanding of the term, no state of war exists at present between the United States and any foreign nation. When the United States invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, just as when it bombed Libyans and Yugoslavians and invaded Panama and Grenada, no state of war existed between it and any nation-- until, of course, the wars began, with unilateral American belligerence. American conduct in these matters is indefensible. On the very afternoon of 9/11, Rumsfeld declared to his cohorts that we ought to attack Saddam. For weapons of mass destruction or for harboring terrorists? Then why did we wait to be attacked? Why did we wait months to hit Afghanistan, and years to hit Iraq? All indefensible. The rest of the world laughs at our disingenuous rationale, and it is a day of great shame for America. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Terror in the Skies, Again?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top