Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
The illusive Nature of Time
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dimension-1hacker" data-source="post: 197819" data-attributes="member: 11791"><p>I did literally just before you commented, added more that would help dissect what I am getting at. What is difficult to dissect? senses = data, data = certain enterpetation by consciousness, do not know the process therefore do not know if the data is being manipulated, certainly consciousness has that ability, read about aristotles prime mover, descartes question everything method, platos cave anology, science is not a substitute for actual logical philosophy, you need to train you mind to synthesize and understand the data which can take some time.</p><p>read about simulation theory, read about the limitations of science, read about the ways your senses can be manipulated.</p><p>simple statement, if everything was just space and mass and there is a beginning... how... no object can cause itself to move and the only way a beginning could occur is if the object caused itself to move, the beginning is the lack of all prior causes. is that the way you define it?</p><p></p><p>True there are many fun topics, and I think those are many of them, the very deep questions, what is more fun the debating the root of science. hope to continue the debate.</p><p></p><p>read isaac asimov books?</p><p></p><p>It does take a large amount of brain power to understand scientific theory concepts, and a greater feat to understand them all but there is a different between sciencetific abstract concepts and metaphysical concepts too, another difference is it can more will power to go down the philosophical "rabbit hole" to question everything about everything in every way, to be prepared to do that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dimension-1hacker, post: 197819, member: 11791"] I did literally just before you commented, added more that would help dissect what I am getting at. What is difficult to dissect? senses = data, data = certain enterpetation by consciousness, do not know the process therefore do not know if the data is being manipulated, certainly consciousness has that ability, read about aristotles prime mover, descartes question everything method, platos cave anology, science is not a substitute for actual logical philosophy, you need to train you mind to synthesize and understand the data which can take some time. read about simulation theory, read about the limitations of science, read about the ways your senses can be manipulated. simple statement, if everything was just space and mass and there is a beginning... how... no object can cause itself to move and the only way a beginning could occur is if the object caused itself to move, the beginning is the lack of all prior causes. is that the way you define it? True there are many fun topics, and I think those are many of them, the very deep questions, what is more fun the debating the root of science. hope to continue the debate. read isaac asimov books? It does take a large amount of brain power to understand scientific theory concepts, and a greater feat to understand them all but there is a different between sciencetific abstract concepts and metaphysical concepts too, another difference is it can more will power to go down the philosophical "rabbit hole" to question everything about everything in every way, to be prepared to do that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
The illusive Nature of Time
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top