Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
The Life Spectrum Hypothesis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 12489" data-attributes="member: 443"><p><strong>Re: The Life Spectrum Hypothesis</strong></p><p></p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Cohiba\")</div></p><p> </p><p>Cohiba,</p><p>First of all, welcome to the site. Now that that's out of the way, here's the first thing that I see about this hypothesis that I don't agree with:</p><p> </p><p> <img src="http://user.uniserve.com/~ghatton/amwave2.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />Figure 2: A 2-Dimensional Light Wave <p style="text-align: left">The wave shown above is the two-dimensional representation of an electromagnetic wave. Similar drawings are made to show sound waves. They are just Trigonometric functions that mimic the repetitive nature of waves and thus make it possible for us to analyze waves mathematically. Actual waves may be nothing like this. I am sure that if you think about it, you will realize that sound waves, at least, must actually be spherical. Waves on a pond's surface, which can also be represented by the same functions used to show electromagnetic waves, are actually circular. I am certain that you are aware of this.</p> <p style="text-align: left"></p> <p style="text-align: left">Anyway, when the author says "regular transverse light waves are only two dimensional", he does not know what he's talking about. Light waves must be three dimensional, otherwise we would not be able to see every detail of an object (a nearby object, in my case.)<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite38" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p> <p style="text-align: left"></p> <p style="text-align: left">Because of this error in the very first part of the author's presentation, I suspect that there is a lot in the paper that I would have objections to, at least scientifically. I haven't (and don't plan to) looked any further in the paper. This first error is enough for me to disregard the premise.</p> <p style="text-align: left"></p> <p style="text-align: left">Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 12489, member: 443"] [b]Re: The Life Spectrum Hypothesis[/b] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Cohiba\")</div> Cohiba, First of all, welcome to the site. Now that that's out of the way, here's the first thing that I see about this hypothesis that I don't agree with: [img]http://user.uniserve.com/~ghatton/amwave2.gif[/img]Figure 2: A 2-Dimensional Light Wave [left]The wave shown above is the two-dimensional representation of an electromagnetic wave. Similar drawings are made to show sound waves. They are just Trigonometric functions that mimic the repetitive nature of waves and thus make it possible for us to analyze waves mathematically. Actual waves may be nothing like this. I am sure that if you think about it, you will realize that sound waves, at least, must actually be spherical. Waves on a pond's surface, which can also be represented by the same functions used to show electromagnetic waves, are actually circular. I am certain that you are aware of this. Anyway, when the author says "regular transverse light waves are only two dimensional", he does not know what he's talking about. Light waves must be three dimensional, otherwise we would not be able to see every detail of an object (a nearby object, in my case.):) Because of this error in the very first part of the author's presentation, I suspect that there is a lot in the paper that I would have objections to, at least scientifically. I haven't (and don't plan to) looked any further in the paper. This first error is enough for me to disregard the premise. Harte[/left] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
The Life Spectrum Hypothesis
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top