Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
1
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
The meaning of 177
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Samstwitch" data-source="post: 73284" data-attributes="member: 2770"><p>IMO, John left us many cryptic clues, but they were obvious ones. I don't believe TR's <em>secret code</em> claims about John Titor.</p><p></p><p>Here are posts where John talked about his mission, the UNIX problem, and the need for an IBM 5100 computer. Sometime after John left, it was verified by some of the original Engineers who were involved with creating the 5100 that what John said about the computer was true, but only a handful of Engineers knew about it at that time. It has since become public knowledge after one of them was interviewed for a Magazine article on John Titor.</p><p></p><p><strong>QUESTION: Why did you go to 1975?</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff">JOHN TITOR: The first "leg" of my trip was from 2036 to 1975. After two VGL checks, the divergence was estimated at about 2.5% (from my 2036). I was "sent" to get an IBM computer system called the 5100. It was one the first portable computers made and it has the ability to read the older IBM programming languages in addition to APL and Basic. We need they system to "debug" various legacy computer programs in 2036. UNIX has a problem in 2038.</span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff"></span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff">On my worldline, it is known that the 5100 series is capable of reading all the IBM code written before the widespread use of APL and Basic. Unfortunately, there are none left that anyone can find on my world line.</span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff"></span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff">Technologies themselves are not lost but some of the older tools and techniques have been lost. I think there is more detailed information about the war posted earlier.</span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff"></span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff">When I leave, I will return to 2036. The computer I have is expected there. </span></p><p></p><p><strong>QUESTION: Earlier you said something was wrong with the UNIX computer code on your worldline. What's wrong with it?</strong></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff">JOHN TITOR: Yes…and with yours too. I have to believe there must be a UNIX expert out there someplace that can confirm that. I'm not exactly sure what the technical issue is but I believe some sort of UNIX system registry stops in 2038.</span></p><p></p><p><strong>COMMENT: I have a working IBM 5160 computer. Maybe I should stash it away for thirty years and see what happens.</strong></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff">JOHN TITOR: Toss it. The 5100 is the interesting machine.</span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff"></span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff">As far as evidence goes, I have however decided to try an experiment with you that may be more convincing. It involves the travel of information at faster than light. In fact, I have dropped at least three little gems like this that no one else has picked up on.</span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff"></span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff">You said you are confused by the 5100 story. I will explain further. In 2036, it was discovered (or at least known after testing) that the 5100 computer was capable of reading and changing all of the legacy code written by IBM before the release of that system and still be able to create new code in APL and basic.</span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff"></span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff">That is the reason we need it in 2036. However, IBM never published that information because it would have probably destroyed a large part of their business infrastructure in the early 70s. In fact, I would bet the engineers were probably told to keep their mouth's shut.</span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff"></span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff">Therefore, if I were not here now telling you this, that information would not be discovered for another 36 years. Yet, I would bet there is someone out there who can do the research and discover I am telling the truth. There must be an old IBM engineer out there someplace that worked on the 5100. They just might not have ever asked if I hadn't pointed it out.</span></p><p></p><p>-------End Posts--------</p><p></p><p><strong>ABOUT THE UNIX PROBLEM</strong></p><p></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff"><span style="color: #ffffff"><strong>The Project 2038 Frequently Asked Questions </strong></span></span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff"><strong><a href="http://maul.deepsky.com/%7Emerovech/2038.html#What_is_the_year_2038_bug" target="_blank">http://maul.deepsky.com/~merovech/2038.html#What_is_the_year_2038_bug</a> </strong></span></p><p><span style="color: #00ffff"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Samstwitch, post: 73284, member: 2770"] IMO, John left us many cryptic clues, but they were obvious ones. I don't believe TR's [I]secret code[/I] claims about John Titor. Here are posts where John talked about his mission, the UNIX problem, and the need for an IBM 5100 computer. Sometime after John left, it was verified by some of the original Engineers who were involved with creating the 5100 that what John said about the computer was true, but only a handful of Engineers knew about it at that time. It has since become public knowledge after one of them was interviewed for a Magazine article on John Titor. [B]QUESTION: Why did you go to 1975? [/B] [COLOR=#00ffff]JOHN TITOR: The first "leg" of my trip was from 2036 to 1975. After two VGL checks, the divergence was estimated at about 2.5% (from my 2036). I was "sent" to get an IBM computer system called the 5100. It was one the first portable computers made and it has the ability to read the older IBM programming languages in addition to APL and Basic. We need they system to "debug" various legacy computer programs in 2036. UNIX has a problem in 2038. On my worldline, it is known that the 5100 series is capable of reading all the IBM code written before the widespread use of APL and Basic. Unfortunately, there are none left that anyone can find on my world line. Technologies themselves are not lost but some of the older tools and techniques have been lost. I think there is more detailed information about the war posted earlier. When I leave, I will return to 2036. The computer I have is expected there. [/COLOR] [B]QUESTION: Earlier you said something was wrong with the UNIX computer code on your worldline. What's wrong with it?[/B] [COLOR=#00ffff]JOHN TITOR: Yes…and with yours too. I have to believe there must be a UNIX expert out there someplace that can confirm that. I'm not exactly sure what the technical issue is but I believe some sort of UNIX system registry stops in 2038.[/COLOR] [B]COMMENT: I have a working IBM 5160 computer. Maybe I should stash it away for thirty years and see what happens.[/B] [COLOR=#00ffff]JOHN TITOR: Toss it. The 5100 is the interesting machine. As far as evidence goes, I have however decided to try an experiment with you that may be more convincing. It involves the travel of information at faster than light. In fact, I have dropped at least three little gems like this that no one else has picked up on. You said you are confused by the 5100 story. I will explain further. In 2036, it was discovered (or at least known after testing) that the 5100 computer was capable of reading and changing all of the legacy code written by IBM before the release of that system and still be able to create new code in APL and basic. That is the reason we need it in 2036. However, IBM never published that information because it would have probably destroyed a large part of their business infrastructure in the early 70s. In fact, I would bet the engineers were probably told to keep their mouth's shut. Therefore, if I were not here now telling you this, that information would not be discovered for another 36 years. Yet, I would bet there is someone out there who can do the research and discover I am telling the truth. There must be an old IBM engineer out there someplace that worked on the 5100. They just might not have ever asked if I hadn't pointed it out.[/COLOR] -------End Posts-------- [B]ABOUT THE UNIX PROBLEM[/B] [COLOR=#00ffff][COLOR=#ffffff][B]The Project 2038 Frequently Asked Questions [/B][/COLOR][/COLOR] [COLOR=#00ffff][B][URL='http://maul.deepsky.com/%7Emerovech/2038.html#What_is_the_year_2038_bug']http://maul.deepsky.com/~merovech/2038.html#What_is_the_year_2038_bug[/URL] [/B] [/COLOR] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
The meaning of 177
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top