Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Three Laws of Chronodynamics
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 19303" data-attributes="member: 443"><p><strong>Re: Three Laws of Chronodynamics</strong></p><p></p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Chronodynamic Jim\")</div></p><p> </p><p>That is not precisely true. If you use the one-at-a-time electron gun, you have to have the photographic plate to detect the electrons. If you have a single light source, it will work with visible light on any screen. It helps to use coherent light though because the interference is more apparent.</p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Chronodynamic Jim\")</div></p><p> </p><p>I would certainly not argue with that. In what way does the speculation by experimental physicists about many worlds differ from the speculation by a bunch of board posters about the laws of chronodynamics?</p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Chronodynamic Jim\")</div></p><p> </p><p>To Mr. Greene, I would give a very simple answer, one that people trying to shoot down the many worlds theory usually ignore. No "many worlds" theorist supposes anything but a straight-line path for photons in the two slit experiment. No one has said that <em>any</em> path is a possible path. The path to Andromeda and back is <em>not one of the possible paths that Feynman was referring to.</em> For one thing, the photon would not return for years because of the distance involved. For another thing, all the photons (or waves) used in the experiment will impinge on and either be absorbed or reflected by the sheet with two slits or the screen behind it. The "all possible paths" meant through slot "a", slot "b" or somewhere on the slotted paper. Additionally, even if we are given a remote probability of a photon taking the andromeda route, then by definition the probability of observing it do so is remote. Another example is electron tunneling. We know that due to the uncertainty principle, a particle can disappear from one spot and reappear somewhere else. If we had a glass full of particles (say water molecules) the possibility exists that all the molecules in the glass could disappear and then reappear on the other side of the glass, resulting in the glass emptying itself out. Since this is possible, why has it not been observed?</p><p> </p><p>Anyway, this is not to infer that I believe the Many Worlds theory. The fact that the Many Worlds explains a lot of what is going on in quantum physics leads me to lean toward the multiple timeline theory of time travel into the past. After all, I'm not aware of any physics that even remotely experimentally supports any other view. Not that that invalidates other views. I mean, ain't nobody time travellin around here anyway.</p><p> </p><p>Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 19303, member: 443"] [b]Re: Three Laws of Chronodynamics[/b] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Chronodynamic Jim\")</div> That is not precisely true. If you use the one-at-a-time electron gun, you have to have the photographic plate to detect the electrons. If you have a single light source, it will work with visible light on any screen. It helps to use coherent light though because the interference is more apparent. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Chronodynamic Jim\")</div> I would certainly not argue with that. In what way does the speculation by experimental physicists about many worlds differ from the speculation by a bunch of board posters about the laws of chronodynamics? <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Chronodynamic Jim\")</div> To Mr. Greene, I would give a very simple answer, one that people trying to shoot down the many worlds theory usually ignore. No "many worlds" theorist supposes anything but a straight-line path for photons in the two slit experiment. No one has said that [i]any[/i] path is a possible path. The path to Andromeda and back is [i]not one of the possible paths that Feynman was referring to.[/i] For one thing, the photon would not return for years because of the distance involved. For another thing, all the photons (or waves) used in the experiment will impinge on and either be absorbed or reflected by the sheet with two slits or the screen behind it. The "all possible paths" meant through slot "a", slot "b" or somewhere on the slotted paper. Additionally, even if we are given a remote probability of a photon taking the andromeda route, then by definition the probability of observing it do so is remote. Another example is electron tunneling. We know that due to the uncertainty principle, a particle can disappear from one spot and reappear somewhere else. If we had a glass full of particles (say water molecules) the possibility exists that all the molecules in the glass could disappear and then reappear on the other side of the glass, resulting in the glass emptying itself out. Since this is possible, why has it not been observed? Anyway, this is not to infer that I believe the Many Worlds theory. The fact that the Many Worlds explains a lot of what is going on in quantum physics leads me to lean toward the multiple timeline theory of time travel into the past. After all, I'm not aware of any physics that even remotely experimentally supports any other view. Not that that invalidates other views. I mean, ain't nobody time travellin around here anyway. Harte [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Three Laws of Chronodynamics
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top