Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Time as Related to Moebius Transform E/M
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iooqxpooi" data-source="post: 12312" data-attributes="member: 30"><p><strong>Time as Related to Moebius Transform E/M</strong></p><p></p><p>OK, first off, there is no measurable distance because we are using less than light mathematics. At c, there would be different dimensions or whatever, changing the mathematics. This is why the relativity equations would be correct. By the way, it is Moebius Transformations...not transforms. Unless he doesn't speak English very well, I don't understand why he said Moebius transforms. E\m=c^2. Thus there is NO need to show E/m. He also could have said v, and at the end of the eqauation have said [v={0,1,2...}]. That implies v goes from 0 to infinity. And that's the end of my critique.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iooqxpooi, post: 12312, member: 30"] [b]Time as Related to Moebius Transform E/M[/b] OK, first off, there is no measurable distance because we are using less than light mathematics. At c, there would be different dimensions or whatever, changing the mathematics. This is why the relativity equations would be correct. By the way, it is Moebius Transformations...not transforms. Unless he doesn't speak English very well, I don't understand why he said Moebius transforms. E\m=c^2. Thus there is NO need to show E/m. He also could have said v, and at the end of the eqauation have said [v={0,1,2...}]. That implies v goes from 0 to infinity. And that's the end of my critique. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Time as Related to Moebius Transform E/M
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top