Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Treeees!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BubbuClinton" data-source="post: 27019" data-attributes="member: 395"><p><strong>Re: Treeees!!!</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Well there are a lot of statements there. Most of which I would have an issue with. However, lets put it this way. I am not proposing the Earth is 6000 years old, and i agree for evolution to have a shot in hell at working it would take "billions and billions or years" like a good Saganite would say. I would agree that there have been new species on the earth at different time. What I disagree with is that evolution fully explains how those species came to exist. I understand your bias against creationism and intelligent design, but just because you don't like something doesn't make it so. And just because you can't think of another theory doesn't make it so either. Lets just say we don't know yet and all of the above proffered theories are just that theories.</p><p> </p><p>Is man a smart rodent? I tend to not support this theory. I think man is man. I do not think that somehow we evolved from a primate which came from a rodent or something. At least I have not seen any credible evidence to demonstrate this. All of the evidence proffered by paleo anthropologist are pretty thin. They find a fraction of a jaw bone and they have a new species all of a sudden. They may find a piece of monkeys little toe that is carbon dated 4 million years ago and declare that there is a new form of man. Yeah right.</p><p> </p><p>My point is evolution is just a theory. It may even be part of the answer, but it is not the complete answer.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I was not really intending to attack you personally. I appologize if I did. It is just that most, not all, evolutionist treat evolution like thier religion, just like Athiest treat thier belief there is no god as a religion.</p><p> </p><p>And yes, the evidence is not compelling.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Evolution is surely a fit subject for peer review. My issue is that most of the peers already subscribe to the fallacy that you proposed. If you already believe that something can change species over time without question then you are not truly examining the issue in an unbiased way. They don't start by asking the question have things changed species, they start out with well this is simillar so it must have evolved. But there is usually a significant difference between the two samples.</p><p> </p><p>Again, I am willing to look at the theory, I just don't take it as a fact.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>OK, belief in an unknown is the same as faith or religion. Thus my point.</p><p> </p><p> No need to hold my hand. Yes I can do research. Thats why I have this issue. If I just watched TV or believed everything they tried to push on me in school, I would be a sheeple.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Thank you</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I am sorry, I should have thought of what others would think.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite61" alt=":unsure:" title="Unsure :unsure:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":unsure:" /> My bad, just a small piece of bad humor.</p><p> </p><p>Stick to your guns if this is what you really believe in.</p><p> </p><p>Bubbu</p><p>__________________________</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BubbuClinton, post: 27019, member: 395"] [b]Re: Treeees!!![/b] Well there are a lot of statements there. Most of which I would have an issue with. However, lets put it this way. I am not proposing the Earth is 6000 years old, and i agree for evolution to have a shot in hell at working it would take "billions and billions or years" like a good Saganite would say. I would agree that there have been new species on the earth at different time. What I disagree with is that evolution fully explains how those species came to exist. I understand your bias against creationism and intelligent design, but just because you don't like something doesn't make it so. And just because you can't think of another theory doesn't make it so either. Lets just say we don't know yet and all of the above proffered theories are just that theories. Is man a smart rodent? I tend to not support this theory. I think man is man. I do not think that somehow we evolved from a primate which came from a rodent or something. At least I have not seen any credible evidence to demonstrate this. All of the evidence proffered by paleo anthropologist are pretty thin. They find a fraction of a jaw bone and they have a new species all of a sudden. They may find a piece of monkeys little toe that is carbon dated 4 million years ago and declare that there is a new form of man. Yeah right. My point is evolution is just a theory. It may even be part of the answer, but it is not the complete answer. I was not really intending to attack you personally. I appologize if I did. It is just that most, not all, evolutionist treat evolution like thier religion, just like Athiest treat thier belief there is no god as a religion. And yes, the evidence is not compelling. Evolution is surely a fit subject for peer review. My issue is that most of the peers already subscribe to the fallacy that you proposed. If you already believe that something can change species over time without question then you are not truly examining the issue in an unbiased way. They don't start by asking the question have things changed species, they start out with well this is simillar so it must have evolved. But there is usually a significant difference between the two samples. Again, I am willing to look at the theory, I just don't take it as a fact. OK, belief in an unknown is the same as faith or religion. Thus my point. No need to hold my hand. Yes I can do research. Thats why I have this issue. If I just watched TV or believed everything they tried to push on me in school, I would be a sheeple. Thank you I am sorry, I should have thought of what others would think.:unsure: My bad, just a small piece of bad humor. Stick to your guns if this is what you really believe in. Bubbu __________________________ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Treeees!!!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top