Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Treeees!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 27038" data-attributes="member: 443"><p><strong>Re: Treeees!!!</strong></p><p></p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Observer\")</div></p><p> </p><p>Observer,</p><p>Thank you for your kind words, but I think we disagree more than you know. Now, I'm no devout believer, but I stand firmly behind my idea that evolution and religion are not mutually exclusive. I do not believe that religion itself is a "psychological crutch," although I agree many people use it as such. I do not pretend to know the truth in these matters, I just am of the opinion that the scientific method must be used if one wishes to understand the physical universe.</p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Observer\")</div></p><p>Here, you are misunderstanding Dmitri's position. (I'm sorry Dmitri for jumping in here before you had a chance to finish choking and start expostulating.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite38" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> )</p><p>It is Dmitri's position that all life originates in Panspermia- a version of ID that assumes intelligent interventions around the universe for the purpose of spreading life. Rounds of seeding of tailored dna-manipulating virus-like materials subsequent to the original seeding of life by some outside influence has changed the precursors of current species into what they are today. (Dmitri - I know that this is a very short and not entirely accurate version of your theory, but it serves my purpose presently.)</p><p>Thus Dmitri is not "frightened" by the idea of being an animal. He fully accepts this idea. You maintain that ID is primarily a creationist argument, and I agree that on the surface, intelligent design seems so. The idea is over-used by creationists because the only scientists creationists can use to bolster their ideas are ones that promote ID. But ID does not equate to creationism and creationism does not equate to religious fundamentalism.</p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Observer\")</div></p><p> </p><p>Ok, Observer, I believe Bubbu has done some research in the area (not as much as Dmitri, I think). Other than that I'm afraid there is little in Bubbu's philosophy that I can defend.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite38" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p> </p><p>Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 27038, member: 443"] [b]Re: Treeees!!![/b] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Observer\")</div> Observer, Thank you for your kind words, but I think we disagree more than you know. Now, I'm no devout believer, but I stand firmly behind my idea that evolution and religion are not mutually exclusive. I do not believe that religion itself is a "psychological crutch," although I agree many people use it as such. I do not pretend to know the truth in these matters, I just am of the opinion that the scientific method must be used if one wishes to understand the physical universe. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Observer\")</div> Here, you are misunderstanding Dmitri's position. (I'm sorry Dmitri for jumping in here before you had a chance to finish choking and start expostulating.:) ) It is Dmitri's position that all life originates in Panspermia- a version of ID that assumes intelligent interventions around the universe for the purpose of spreading life. Rounds of seeding of tailored dna-manipulating virus-like materials subsequent to the original seeding of life by some outside influence has changed the precursors of current species into what they are today. (Dmitri - I know that this is a very short and not entirely accurate version of your theory, but it serves my purpose presently.) Thus Dmitri is not "frightened" by the idea of being an animal. He fully accepts this idea. You maintain that ID is primarily a creationist argument, and I agree that on the surface, intelligent design seems so. The idea is over-used by creationists because the only scientists creationists can use to bolster their ideas are ones that promote ID. But ID does not equate to creationism and creationism does not equate to religious fundamentalism. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"Observer\")</div> Ok, Observer, I believe Bubbu has done some research in the area (not as much as Dmitri, I think). Other than that I'm afraid there is little in Bubbu's philosophy that I can defend.:) Harte [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Treeees!!!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top