Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Treeees!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Observer" data-source="post: 27044" data-attributes="member: 576"><p><strong>Re: Treeees!!!</strong></p><p></p><p>Dmitri,</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Interest speculation indeed. </p><p> </p><p>My only question about your last two posts is regarding the bacteria in space.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Bacteria are living creatures. If anything, lifeform wise, had ever been discovered on another world or in space it would be in every textbook and astrobiologist would be publishing monthly in Nature. I see this nowhere (And I suscribe to Nature, Science, etc...) </p><p> </p><p>Now let me surprise you, perhaps. I have read up about these two scientist and their theories. (Though it seems they are not very well accepted by the majority of the scientific community). I must say it is an interesting premise. One that many biologist say is possible, though they don't suscribe to the theory themselves. If it is possible, it belongs up there in my chest of things to ponder with my peers. I had not thought of panspermia since the 80's, when it was a very fringe belief. At that time I was delving into many different aspects of science, trying to understand the reasoning behind so many different views of how,what,when,why, and where. (Teenager, what can I say). I never looked at it again as it was really SF in my book. I see now I need to update my knowledge of the topic. </p><p> </p><p>My only question regarding panspermia is that it still does not answer where the bacteria (or whatver may be there) came from. Where was the mother source. If it evolved naturally there, then why not here. If it can evolve naturally here..why need panspermia. Anyways, circular argument.</p><p> </p><p>Jim</p><p> </p><p>(I really need to get an English language spell checker on this)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Observer, post: 27044, member: 576"] [b]Re: Treeees!!![/b] Dmitri, Interest speculation indeed. My only question about your last two posts is regarding the bacteria in space. Bacteria are living creatures. If anything, lifeform wise, had ever been discovered on another world or in space it would be in every textbook and astrobiologist would be publishing monthly in Nature. I see this nowhere (And I suscribe to Nature, Science, etc...) Now let me surprise you, perhaps. I have read up about these two scientist and their theories. (Though it seems they are not very well accepted by the majority of the scientific community). I must say it is an interesting premise. One that many biologist say is possible, though they don't suscribe to the theory themselves. If it is possible, it belongs up there in my chest of things to ponder with my peers. I had not thought of panspermia since the 80's, when it was a very fringe belief. At that time I was delving into many different aspects of science, trying to understand the reasoning behind so many different views of how,what,when,why, and where. (Teenager, what can I say). I never looked at it again as it was really SF in my book. I see now I need to update my knowledge of the topic. My only question regarding panspermia is that it still does not answer where the bacteria (or whatver may be there) came from. Where was the mother source. If it evolved naturally there, then why not here. If it can evolve naturally here..why need panspermia. Anyways, circular argument. Jim (I really need to get an English language spell checker on this) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Treeees!!!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top