Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
What was John's mission?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Anonynez" data-source="post: 63923" data-attributes="member: 3528"><p>We are on the same side madam. Please allow me to elaborate.</p><p> </p><p>You, nor me, nor anyone can PHYSICALLY avoid Nuclear War if we are indeed on the cusp of one. If we are speaking within the realm of our physical world and the pseudo tyrannical government that we are currently dealing with, the answer is probably No. I mean, if someone is going to push the button, they're going to push the button. We cant physically stop that. I for one am not a fan of the current president or his stance on the second amendment, etc. I personally think the man makes Nixon look like a law abiding Ice Cream man in a working class suburban neighborhood. That was not what the previous posters were implicating when questioning your logic. If the thread and the topic is about John Titor, his predictions as well as his philosophies, then in context we must assume that it is possible that we can avoid the world war and the N day that he spoke of. He often alluded to the fact that we COULD avoid it, just that he didnt want to tell us how because he thought it was good for us. With regard to the Titor topic and the Titor story, if enough of us become fed up with our current government, and we do revolt, if that revolt ultimately caused a change, such as overthrowing or replacing a tyrannical government, then we could effectively change the worlds view of us as a country. Titors story says that our government was attacked, not the people. So, in THEORY, if we were to overthrow the current government, and put in place a new set of leaders that didnt take a giant S**T on the constitution, as well as foreign policies and procedures (turning backs on allies), foreign countries like Russia or China wouldnt feel the need to attack our government. Once again I use the word THEORY. This is all in the context of the John Titor story. He said we could change, so to answer the question for the uninformed with regard to the topic of John Titor, Yes I think we could avoid it because he said that we could. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Once again, with regard to the topic as it pertains to John Titor, I was more responding generally to Sevensixtwo's comment, or anyone that might be uninformed of the deep seeded particulars of the John Titor story. I was kind of giving basic answers to the inquiry or assumption that his mission might have been something other than what he obviously said it was in his original posts. His "posts" (which would be considered "trolling" by the uninformed) directly answer the inquiry to his "ulterior motive" and or "agenda" while interacting with people on our timeline in the year 2000. I basically just paraphrased his posts to help educate. And please dont get me wrong and assume that Im trying to debate. If I were to debate it would be friendly, I assure you. I will happily give you the credit as being one of the resident Titor experts; however, Im pretty sure that John Mentioned in his posts that when he came back to the new 1998 he could easily do this all over again, but that it wouldnt do any good because we wouldnt listen. Several times he referenced that he traveled to 1998, and anyone familiar with the story knows that one or two Johns allegedly sent the original faxes to Art Bell in 1998. So, I dont think that is only information that you can find in Kay Titors book. I do admit that I have not read that book. Thats probably the only bit of research that I havent done because as much as I love the story I refuse to pay $200-$1000 for it lollol. With the economy the way it is and a child to raise, it doesnt fit into my budget. I would LOVE a copy if I could get my hands on one. I have read excerpts that you posted in your referenced thread, and I was very VERY intrigued by it. I wish I could get my hands on one so that I could read his mothers perspective and get those small bits of information that I dont have. You are correct in that regard. Im sure I am missing alot of information that most likely gives some wonderful insight when it comes to "A Time Travelers Tale".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Anonynez, post: 63923, member: 3528"] We are on the same side madam. Please allow me to elaborate. You, nor me, nor anyone can PHYSICALLY avoid Nuclear War if we are indeed on the cusp of one. If we are speaking within the realm of our physical world and the pseudo tyrannical government that we are currently dealing with, the answer is probably No. I mean, if someone is going to push the button, they're going to push the button. We cant physically stop that. I for one am not a fan of the current president or his stance on the second amendment, etc. I personally think the man makes Nixon look like a law abiding Ice Cream man in a working class suburban neighborhood. That was not what the previous posters were implicating when questioning your logic. If the thread and the topic is about John Titor, his predictions as well as his philosophies, then in context we must assume that it is possible that we can avoid the world war and the N day that he spoke of. He often alluded to the fact that we COULD avoid it, just that he didnt want to tell us how because he thought it was good for us. With regard to the Titor topic and the Titor story, if enough of us become fed up with our current government, and we do revolt, if that revolt ultimately caused a change, such as overthrowing or replacing a tyrannical government, then we could effectively change the worlds view of us as a country. Titors story says that our government was attacked, not the people. So, in THEORY, if we were to overthrow the current government, and put in place a new set of leaders that didnt take a giant S**T on the constitution, as well as foreign policies and procedures (turning backs on allies), foreign countries like Russia or China wouldnt feel the need to attack our government. Once again I use the word THEORY. This is all in the context of the John Titor story. He said we could change, so to answer the question for the uninformed with regard to the topic of John Titor, Yes I think we could avoid it because he said that we could. Once again, with regard to the topic as it pertains to John Titor, I was more responding generally to Sevensixtwo's comment, or anyone that might be uninformed of the deep seeded particulars of the John Titor story. I was kind of giving basic answers to the inquiry or assumption that his mission might have been something other than what he obviously said it was in his original posts. His "posts" (which would be considered "trolling" by the uninformed) directly answer the inquiry to his "ulterior motive" and or "agenda" while interacting with people on our timeline in the year 2000. I basically just paraphrased his posts to help educate. And please dont get me wrong and assume that Im trying to debate. If I were to debate it would be friendly, I assure you. I will happily give you the credit as being one of the resident Titor experts; however, Im pretty sure that John Mentioned in his posts that when he came back to the new 1998 he could easily do this all over again, but that it wouldnt do any good because we wouldnt listen. Several times he referenced that he traveled to 1998, and anyone familiar with the story knows that one or two Johns allegedly sent the original faxes to Art Bell in 1998. So, I dont think that is only information that you can find in Kay Titors book. I do admit that I have not read that book. Thats probably the only bit of research that I havent done because as much as I love the story I refuse to pay $200-$1000 for it lollol. With the economy the way it is and a child to raise, it doesnt fit into my budget. I would LOVE a copy if I could get my hands on one. I have read excerpts that you posted in your referenced thread, and I was very VERY intrigued by it. I wish I could get my hands on one so that I could read his mothers perspective and get those small bits of information that I dont have. You are correct in that regard. Im sure I am missing alot of information that most likely gives some wonderful insight when it comes to "A Time Travelers Tale". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
What was John's mission?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top