Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Who Perpetrated the John Titor Hoax?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="temporal recon" data-source="post: 53350" data-attributes="member: 2826"><p>My, my, Peregrini. You certainly are the gift that keeps on giving.</p><p>Yes, Titor's purported mission to 1975 has never been confirmed. The evidence that I discovered far overshadowed the quirks in the 5100 (only one of which you seem to be aware of), thus rendering the 5100 portion of the story just that, a portion.</p><p> </p><p>I find it odd and amusing that you are now placed in the position of defending Titor's storyline, in spite of the fact you claim (without evidence) that it is a hoax.</p><p> </p><p>In response to your assertion that I was somehow hiding my small book project in some way, allow me to say that this is a no-win situation. </p><p>If I were to announce ahead of every post that I had written a book answering all the questions we have all had about the Titor story (which is exactly what my book does), any statement or piece of evidence I provided would be seen through the prism of "commericalism" or shameless profiteering and self promotion.</p><p>If, on the other hand, I <em>do not</em> mention the book and simply participate in the debate, I am now accused of hiding my book; luring unsuspecting readers into buying the book somehow by <em>not </em>promoting it.</p><p>So which would I rather be seen as? A shameless self promoter or a nefarious "hider" of my book? The latter most definitely argues against the former I would say. Nonetheless, I chose to not make the book an issue, (the facts DO speak for themselves after all). The link to the book's website has always ever been part of my signature, so I doubt I could credibly be accused of "hiding" my involvement in my own book.</p><p> </p><p>Seriously, Peregrini: is this all there is to your argument against Titor? Attacking the messenger?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="temporal recon, post: 53350, member: 2826"] My, my, Peregrini. You certainly are the gift that keeps on giving. Yes, Titor's purported mission to 1975 has never been confirmed. The evidence that I discovered far overshadowed the quirks in the 5100 (only one of which you seem to be aware of), thus rendering the 5100 portion of the story just that, a portion. I find it odd and amusing that you are now placed in the position of defending Titor's storyline, in spite of the fact you claim (without evidence) that it is a hoax. In response to your assertion that I was somehow hiding my small book project in some way, allow me to say that this is a no-win situation. If I were to announce ahead of every post that I had written a book answering all the questions we have all had about the Titor story (which is exactly what my book does), any statement or piece of evidence I provided would be seen through the prism of "commericalism" or shameless profiteering and self promotion. If, on the other hand, I [I]do not[/I] mention the book and simply participate in the debate, I am now accused of hiding my book; luring unsuspecting readers into buying the book somehow by [I]not [/I]promoting it. So which would I rather be seen as? A shameless self promoter or a nefarious "hider" of my book? The latter most definitely argues against the former I would say. Nonetheless, I chose to not make the book an issue, (the facts DO speak for themselves after all). The link to the book's website has always ever been part of my signature, so I doubt I could credibly be accused of "hiding" my involvement in my own book. Seriously, Peregrini: is this all there is to your argument against Titor? Attacking the messenger? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Who Perpetrated the John Titor Hoax?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top