Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Who Perpetrated the John Titor Hoax?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Peregrini" data-source="post: 53385" data-attributes="member: 2670"><p>I didn't say it was OK or give you permission. I said others were not attacked. If you do want to advertise your book, speak with Numenorean7 and he may let you for a fee.</p><p></p><p>And you probably never will. I have offered to compare "my truth" with "your truth" but you can only offer the same excuse:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p>If not one single piece of your evidence can stand on it's own but can only be effective when presented all together, you have nothing but circumstantial evidence.</p><p>You'll have little chance of prevailing in court'</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>We began this discussion with reference to your evidence which you have alternately referred to as facts and evidence. Evidence and proof are actually more synonymous. Facts are derived from them. Quite simply neither facts nor evidence can speak for themselves. They are presented and are considered for their factuality.</p><p>You don't appear to have taken any classes on logic or science because there you would have learned that what you may see as facts are not. True facts are the result of testing and interpretation of the results. There is no way for you to have tested the evidence that was left by Titor. He was actually quite careful at first by refusing to give predictions for various (moral?) reasons but he let the excitement of the moment get the better of him and made a few after all. He cleverly covered his ass with the multiple time line pretext and divergence. If you understood logic at all you would know you have this backwards. If you want to understand that, you will have to work for it...look it up.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>WHAT? You think Titor was THE FIRST to predict doom and gloom.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>I haven't called you any names or accused you of being intellectually dishonest ( and considering this discussion...) so, Who is attacking the messenger?</p><p> </p><p>Your Honor;</p><p>temporal recon has failed to present any evidence, proof, or facts. He has only offered evasion tactics. He has failed to prove his case.</p><p>The Plaintiff rests.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Peregrini, post: 53385, member: 2670"] I didn't say it was OK or give you permission. I said others were not attacked. If you do want to advertise your book, speak with Numenorean7 and he may let you for a fee. And you probably never will. I have offered to compare "my truth" with "your truth" but you can only offer the same excuse: If not one single piece of your evidence can stand on it's own but can only be effective when presented all together, you have nothing but circumstantial evidence. You'll have little chance of prevailing in court' We began this discussion with reference to your evidence which you have alternately referred to as facts and evidence. Evidence and proof are actually more synonymous. Facts are derived from them. Quite simply neither facts nor evidence can speak for themselves. They are presented and are considered for their factuality. You don't appear to have taken any classes on logic or science because there you would have learned that what you may see as facts are not. True facts are the result of testing and interpretation of the results. There is no way for you to have tested the evidence that was left by Titor. He was actually quite careful at first by refusing to give predictions for various (moral?) reasons but he let the excitement of the moment get the better of him and made a few after all. He cleverly covered his ass with the multiple time line pretext and divergence. If you understood logic at all you would know you have this backwards. If you want to understand that, you will have to work for it...look it up. WHAT? You think Titor was THE FIRST to predict doom and gloom. I haven't called you any names or accused you of being intellectually dishonest ( and considering this discussion...) so, Who is attacking the messenger? Your Honor; temporal recon has failed to present any evidence, proof, or facts. He has only offered evasion tactics. He has failed to prove his case. The Plaintiff rests. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Who Perpetrated the John Titor Hoax?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top