Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
1
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Who Perpetrated the John Titor Hoax?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="temporal recon" data-source="post: 53422" data-attributes="member: 2826"><p>I'm sure there's a point coming...</p><p> </p><p></p><p>but not in training or education as evidenced by your posts?</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Is it better to continue with the wrong, more familiar definitions?</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Making mistakes is how you learn. I am always willing to help someone learn something new. Your welcome.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p></p><p>Thank you. I don't speak latin. I will, <em>ehem, </em>assume your translations are correct. While your definitive google search for the definition only took you .25 seconds, I just ain't got that kind of time. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite39" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Here's a good example to all those reading these posts why you keep failing to make any headway in the Titor question: you don't know the difference between facts, proof or evidence. I'm only going to lead this horse to water so many times before I decide the horse just isn't thirsty.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>This is true. Good thing that's not what I did, or else you might have a legitimate argument. Of course, you wouldn't know one way or another since you haven't read the book. Don't worry, you've still got time! By my analysis, I'd say less than 6 months. Feel free to stop by <a href="http://www.convictionofatimetraveler.com" target="_blank">Conviction of a Time Traveler</a> and order a signed copy today! Of course, it is also available on Amazon where you can read some great reviews about the book. Feel free to check it out and let everyone know the opinions of those who have actually READ the book.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Yup. Again, good thing I didn't do that.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Another reason you fail to make any progress and see the truth right in front of your face.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>This was true in 2000. Not anymore. Want to learn more? <a href="http://www.convictionofatimetraveler.com" target="_blank">Conviction of a Time Traveler</a></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I wonder, and I should have posed this question from the very beginning:</p><p style="text-align: center"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000"><em>What evidence are you willing to accept?</em> </span></strong></p><p>If there IS NO evidence that you will accept, then I'm afraid you're not a skeptic, you're a debunker.</p><p>I'm sure ole Webster is just waiting for you to pull him out again and get two more pesky definitions, right?</p><p> </p><p></p><p>This is true. No facts have "changed" in 12 years, they've simply come into being. Does the fact that a jet aircraft doesn't exist in 1908 take away from the <u>verifiable fact</u> that it now exists in 2012?</p><p> </p><p></p><p>I sure dislike sweeping generalizations such as these. You claim the Titor posts have been modified. Do you have any <u>EVIDENCE</u> of this happening? Or is this another....<em>assumption</em> that you're making (again)?</p><p>It's interesting how it seems that generally sweeping generalizations usually come from the most uninformed of us, don't you agree?</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Oh no, I'm not surprised at all. It's a typical reaction to be sure. What is truly awesome (awe-inspiring that is) is to watch how the expression changes as the evidence is presented to them. At a certain point, the lightbulb starts to turn on. Sure, it comes on, dimly at first, fighting against conventional wisdom, conventional wisdom propagated by those with similar uninformed opinions such as your own...but once the question is planted, it begins to germinate. ...sorry for mixing my metaphors.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Getting a little tuckered out are we, from constantly playing defense?</p><p>Thirsty yet, Mr. Peregrini?</p><p>If anyone else reading these posts have any questions, I welcome them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="temporal recon, post: 53422, member: 2826"] I'm sure there's a point coming... but not in training or education as evidenced by your posts? Is it better to continue with the wrong, more familiar definitions? Making mistakes is how you learn. I am always willing to help someone learn something new. Your welcome. Thank you. I don't speak latin. I will, [I]ehem, [/I]assume your translations are correct. While your definitive google search for the definition only took you .25 seconds, I just ain't got that kind of time. ;) Here's a good example to all those reading these posts why you keep failing to make any headway in the Titor question: you don't know the difference between facts, proof or evidence. I'm only going to lead this horse to water so many times before I decide the horse just isn't thirsty. This is true. Good thing that's not what I did, or else you might have a legitimate argument. Of course, you wouldn't know one way or another since you haven't read the book. Don't worry, you've still got time! By my analysis, I'd say less than 6 months. Feel free to stop by [URL='http://www.convictionofatimetraveler.com']Conviction of a Time Traveler[/URL] and order a signed copy today! Of course, it is also available on Amazon where you can read some great reviews about the book. Feel free to check it out and let everyone know the opinions of those who have actually READ the book. Yup. Again, good thing I didn't do that. Another reason you fail to make any progress and see the truth right in front of your face. This was true in 2000. Not anymore. Want to learn more? [URL='http://www.convictionofatimetraveler.com']Conviction of a Time Traveler[/URL] I wonder, and I should have posed this question from the very beginning: [CENTER][B][COLOR=#ff0000][I]What evidence are you willing to accept?[/I] [/COLOR][/B][/CENTER] If there IS NO evidence that you will accept, then I'm afraid you're not a skeptic, you're a debunker. I'm sure ole Webster is just waiting for you to pull him out again and get two more pesky definitions, right? This is true. No facts have "changed" in 12 years, they've simply come into being. Does the fact that a jet aircraft doesn't exist in 1908 take away from the [U]verifiable fact[/U] that it now exists in 2012? I sure dislike sweeping generalizations such as these. You claim the Titor posts have been modified. Do you have any [U]EVIDENCE[/U] of this happening? Or is this another....[I]assumption[/I] that you're making (again)? It's interesting how it seems that generally sweeping generalizations usually come from the most uninformed of us, don't you agree? Oh no, I'm not surprised at all. It's a typical reaction to be sure. What is truly awesome (awe-inspiring that is) is to watch how the expression changes as the evidence is presented to them. At a certain point, the lightbulb starts to turn on. Sure, it comes on, dimly at first, fighting against conventional wisdom, conventional wisdom propagated by those with similar uninformed opinions such as your own...but once the question is planted, it begins to germinate. ...sorry for mixing my metaphors. Getting a little tuckered out are we, from constantly playing defense? Thirsty yet, Mr. Peregrini? If anyone else reading these posts have any questions, I welcome them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Who Perpetrated the John Titor Hoax?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top