Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
why are people still taking John Titor seriously?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ren" data-source="post: 94840" data-attributes="member: 2659"><p>You don't get to insult me and then tell me you're not interested in my retort -- calling it "rhetoric". It's rich that you call me misguided when you won't even address the 20 facts I have presented before you. 20 facts that prove that Plutarchus was the source of Acts and Romans.</p><p></p><p>Romans == Romulus. It is not an opinion. It is a proven fact. The ascension of Romulus to Heaven is the same, often word for word, as the ascension of Jesus.</p><p></p><p>Lucius Plutarchus is Luke and is the source of Saint Luke and he is also the source of the Book of Acts.</p><p></p><p>Not an opinion. Fact.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.gottnotes.com/ArticlesLukeandPlutarch2.html" target="_blank">Luke and Plutarch</a></p><p></p><p>You seem to think I'm stupid enough to be distracted by your personal attacks when what you should be defending here is the Bible.</p><p></p><p>Or does it upset you to know that someone from the future is telling everyone that Christianity was authored by Titus, Josephus and Plutarch..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ren, post: 94840, member: 2659"] You don't get to insult me and then tell me you're not interested in my retort -- calling it "rhetoric". It's rich that you call me misguided when you won't even address the 20 facts I have presented before you. 20 facts that prove that Plutarchus was the source of Acts and Romans. Romans == Romulus. It is not an opinion. It is a proven fact. The ascension of Romulus to Heaven is the same, often word for word, as the ascension of Jesus. Lucius Plutarchus is Luke and is the source of Saint Luke and he is also the source of the Book of Acts. Not an opinion. Fact. [url="http://www.gottnotes.com/ArticlesLukeandPlutarch2.html"]Luke and Plutarch[/url] You seem to think I'm stupid enough to be distracted by your personal attacks when what you should be defending here is the Bible. Or does it upset you to know that someone from the future is telling everyone that Christianity was authored by Titus, Josephus and Plutarch.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
why are people still taking John Titor seriously?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top