Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Why do many (but not all) Conservatives hate the environment?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pix3l_P0w3r" data-source="post: 165003" data-attributes="member: 9968"><p>I feel I should clarify that the damage done to the environment by fossil fuels that I was referring to, is proven damage, not that necessarily done by purported global warming. Major oil spills that affect ocean life, localized environments, and ecosystems. We know for a fact, that certain cities in China have problems with smog due to their emissions. This affects the health of the citizens and depending on the day, the smog can be dangerous to inhale. Largely this is due to human errors and it could be improved by engineering and designing where fossil fuels don't present these types of risks to society.</p><p></p><p>I do understand mother nature has a way of staying healthy. I'm not worried about damage to mother nature, but rather us. We have the capability to damage mother nature to the point she can no longer support us. We will die out, and once the disease has been eradicated (us), mother nature will heal and return to normal. This also supports the notion that global warming doesn't exist, since whatever impact we have on our planet, is directly related to our survival, not the survival of the planet.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pix3l_P0w3r, post: 165003, member: 9968"] I feel I should clarify that the damage done to the environment by fossil fuels that I was referring to, is proven damage, not that necessarily done by purported global warming. Major oil spills that affect ocean life, localized environments, and ecosystems. We know for a fact, that certain cities in China have problems with smog due to their emissions. This affects the health of the citizens and depending on the day, the smog can be dangerous to inhale. Largely this is due to human errors and it could be improved by engineering and designing where fossil fuels don't present these types of risks to society. I do understand mother nature has a way of staying healthy. I'm not worried about damage to mother nature, but rather us. We have the capability to damage mother nature to the point she can no longer support us. We will die out, and once the disease has been eradicated (us), mother nature will heal and return to normal. This also supports the notion that global warming doesn't exist, since whatever impact we have on our planet, is directly related to our survival, not the survival of the planet. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Why do many (but not all) Conservatives hate the environment?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top