Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Why I dont believe in HDRs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="J-Truthseeker" data-source="post: 13101" data-attributes="member: 537"><p><strong>Re: Why I dont believe in HDRs</strong></p><p></p><p>Greetings there,</p><p> </p><p>While reading through these topic strings on this forum, it amazes me to know end just how much the majority of these skeptical posts are not written with any real objective intentions. As much as I can understand using a bit of healthy skepticism in certain cases which I've often used myself in regards to certain UFO claims, I've also investigated over the years the kind of skepticism that holds no validity of any sort. In a way I'm also very much skeptical of what people constitute as skepticism. Usually you just have people who sit at home in front of their computers who post, not skepticism, but rather criticism because they need something more to feel good for their own self importance.</p><p> </p><p>A perfect example of this usually happens in cases involving places of UFO sightings and people with UFO contacts. More often then not and I still see this time and time and time again, skeptics will always fail to check out the actual places and proof where UFOs are reported to be seen, nor do they attempt to actually see and film for themselves the act of those very people who can actually call down UFOs and board the craft. Their response of course is, "UFOs can't possibly exist and those people who make such wild claims aren't worth looking into, nor even investigating!". </p><p> </p><p>Notice how skeptics usually is a COP OUT based only on assumption when confronted by real situations??? No kidding!!!</p><p> </p><p>I also know of situations where skeptics will also commit their own frauds, such as drawing those strings in on those real UFO photos and the denial of evidence when presented or given the actual proof to examine. In real cases where this has actually happened and then when later not presented with the real evidence, that in turn will become their base for argument. So exactly what constitutes proof??? The answer is nothing does, because even under strict scientific analysis of scientifically controlled environments, science by todays standards defines evidence as being proven only when it's disproven. This of course defeats the real purpose of any true findings and furthermore promotes the egos of those who strive for the highest credibility. Therefore it is true that among the majority of the Earth human beings, self importance is viewed as far more important then life itself! People have this uncanny belief that if they can go to their grave with a well known name in history, then they've achieved this life long goal and if they can get their with an institutionalized certified ego, then they are all the more happier. Now let's look at this a bit further. throughout people's lives people are taught what to believe and what not to believe, what to accept as truth and what not to accept as truth, they are taught what to think, YET THEY ARE NOT TAUGHT HOW TO THINK. Then perhaps it should come as no surprise that the greatest prophets, and scientific thinking minds in human history all had one thing in common and that is they all could independently think for themselves. They knew how to think.</p><p> </p><p>As strange as it all sounds, people who are diagnosed with mental and emotional disorders, do in fact make up the majority of those who are artistic, creative and open minded. Unfortunately, only less then one percent of those people who are open minded, creative and artistic, are considered to be level headed and in rare cases truly psychic with a kind of developed six sense. Fortunately those numbers are increasing as certain events in the world are also increasing. What this suggests is that in many cases it's not until a person develops a psychiatric disorder of some kind, then do they consider the possibilities of there being more to their own thinking existence than what they've being taught in school all these years, and that's unfortunate because by that time these thinking disorders usually lead the person astray to some real serious emotional, mental and even physical health problems. Perhaps then it comes as no surprised that un-institutionalized individuals express a much higher lever of creativity in their lives by far then say those certified with PhDs. Even will known physicist Steven Hawking probably would not have achieved his level of intelligence without having a neurological disability such as MS. </p><p> </p><p>Getting back to Steven Gibbs and his so called HDRs. First of all, Steven Gibbs was not the person who actually invented, nor designed from scratch the HDRs. He specifically mentions two people before him, these being Jim Gerrard and Bruce Perault, both of whom called it the Sonic Resonator. Steven Gibbs only started building his units from their design and started calling it the HDR. So in getting the facts straight, not once have I seen as of yet in going through this forum, any enquiries from any skeptic as to investigating these other 2 individuals, and to even find out if they actually exist. Perhaps I have not come across this information on this forum yet, or perhaps it's still as it's always being with such skeptics in their thinking; "Something does not exist, because I ASSUME it does not exist". Steven Gibbs may or may not be the real thing, but considering that a lack of institutionalized education proves nothing when considering the names of other such pseudo scientists who actually have discovered something as high school drop outs. Names like; John Hutchison, Tim Ventura and Patrick Flanagan, who appear often today on discovery channel TV regarding "fringe science" with actual footage and physical proof regarding things like the "Hutchison Effect". UNFORTUNATELY now, any possible real footage, photos and physical evidence of say any UFO landing, UFO contact with aliens, Time Travellers from the future, working time machines, time travel experiences, etc, will never constitute the extraordinary smoking gun proof to any such extraordinary claims, because in the face of already assuming skeptics, these things could never possibly exist anyway and therefore must aways be the best result of trickery, hypnosis and computer CGI special effects. At that, there is no such thing as absolute proof, therefore presenting or asking for even the best of possible proof is nothing more then a person's waste of time! There are even skeptics who will tell you that the world is actually flat with no convincing otherwise; for to see it as round out there is nothing more then a hypnotic placebo trance effect when floating in zero gravity space! </p><p> </p><p>Here is my observation so far regarding HDRs. Regardless of people opinions, I have not actually used an HDR, therefore I can not give you a first hand account as of yet, however, that's not to say that they don't work. When looking at how to build them and from people's reports, I can say that HDRs are actually radionic machines used with electro magnets or with one electro magnet, depending on how you want to build them. A radionic machine is simply a tool that helps an individual "focus" a desired intent into reality without an exhausting concentrating effort, in much the same way as say using a tool for dowsing, but like a dowsing rod, it needs to be tuned in to a "zero point" field of consciousness for maximum results. Believe it or not, the same is true for the human mind. A person who can completely clear their mind and then focus on a desired intent for any extended period of time, does not need a dowsing rod, nor a radionics machine, nor even an HDR! As it so happens, people can actually achieve; mental, astral and even physical time travel, teleportation, apportation, invisibility, psychic force healing, and even levitation, by using concentrated meditation. This however is a lifetime of practise according to the achievements of the Dzogchen Tibetan monks, but if your looking for quicker results, a group collective intent of many individuals focused on a single point or person can produce good results, simply because people believe it works, such as the successful collective healings, etc, found in churches, temples, etc, which BTW is why many of the more ancient churches, temples and places of worship are found already existing on natural grid points. Meditation on places of power, which generate a lot of orgone can easily be directed with the mind for better results depending on how well one can focus, or how well one can be hypnotized to focus. Orgone is simply a natural generated psychic force energy consciousness where electro magnets can simply be used to compress or tune it into a zero point field. Then with the right intentions, anything is possible. I can see that an HDR is simply yet another tool one can use to achieve all these results, but without the physical body experiencing its complete exhaustion. A woman in Hawaii by the name of Gwen Totterdale is said to have achieved healing, physical and astral teleportation, and time travel, by experimenting with the collective energies of a large group of people around her. In time, others in her group where able to do this also, but not around those people with blocked minds. </p><p> </p><p>Simply put; time travel can not exist if it's not possible in a person's accepted reality.</p><p> </p><p>James Truthseeker.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="J-Truthseeker, post: 13101, member: 537"] [b]Re: Why I dont believe in HDRs[/b] Greetings there, While reading through these topic strings on this forum, it amazes me to know end just how much the majority of these skeptical posts are not written with any real objective intentions. As much as I can understand using a bit of healthy skepticism in certain cases which I've often used myself in regards to certain UFO claims, I've also investigated over the years the kind of skepticism that holds no validity of any sort. In a way I'm also very much skeptical of what people constitute as skepticism. Usually you just have people who sit at home in front of their computers who post, not skepticism, but rather criticism because they need something more to feel good for their own self importance. A perfect example of this usually happens in cases involving places of UFO sightings and people with UFO contacts. More often then not and I still see this time and time and time again, skeptics will always fail to check out the actual places and proof where UFOs are reported to be seen, nor do they attempt to actually see and film for themselves the act of those very people who can actually call down UFOs and board the craft. Their response of course is, "UFOs can't possibly exist and those people who make such wild claims aren't worth looking into, nor even investigating!". Notice how skeptics usually is a COP OUT based only on assumption when confronted by real situations??? No kidding!!! I also know of situations where skeptics will also commit their own frauds, such as drawing those strings in on those real UFO photos and the denial of evidence when presented or given the actual proof to examine. In real cases where this has actually happened and then when later not presented with the real evidence, that in turn will become their base for argument. So exactly what constitutes proof??? The answer is nothing does, because even under strict scientific analysis of scientifically controlled environments, science by todays standards defines evidence as being proven only when it's disproven. This of course defeats the real purpose of any true findings and furthermore promotes the egos of those who strive for the highest credibility. Therefore it is true that among the majority of the Earth human beings, self importance is viewed as far more important then life itself! People have this uncanny belief that if they can go to their grave with a well known name in history, then they've achieved this life long goal and if they can get their with an institutionalized certified ego, then they are all the more happier. Now let's look at this a bit further. throughout people's lives people are taught what to believe and what not to believe, what to accept as truth and what not to accept as truth, they are taught what to think, YET THEY ARE NOT TAUGHT HOW TO THINK. Then perhaps it should come as no surprise that the greatest prophets, and scientific thinking minds in human history all had one thing in common and that is they all could independently think for themselves. They knew how to think. As strange as it all sounds, people who are diagnosed with mental and emotional disorders, do in fact make up the majority of those who are artistic, creative and open minded. Unfortunately, only less then one percent of those people who are open minded, creative and artistic, are considered to be level headed and in rare cases truly psychic with a kind of developed six sense. Fortunately those numbers are increasing as certain events in the world are also increasing. What this suggests is that in many cases it's not until a person develops a psychiatric disorder of some kind, then do they consider the possibilities of there being more to their own thinking existence than what they've being taught in school all these years, and that's unfortunate because by that time these thinking disorders usually lead the person astray to some real serious emotional, mental and even physical health problems. Perhaps then it comes as no surprised that un-institutionalized individuals express a much higher lever of creativity in their lives by far then say those certified with PhDs. Even will known physicist Steven Hawking probably would not have achieved his level of intelligence without having a neurological disability such as MS. Getting back to Steven Gibbs and his so called HDRs. First of all, Steven Gibbs was not the person who actually invented, nor designed from scratch the HDRs. He specifically mentions two people before him, these being Jim Gerrard and Bruce Perault, both of whom called it the Sonic Resonator. Steven Gibbs only started building his units from their design and started calling it the HDR. So in getting the facts straight, not once have I seen as of yet in going through this forum, any enquiries from any skeptic as to investigating these other 2 individuals, and to even find out if they actually exist. Perhaps I have not come across this information on this forum yet, or perhaps it's still as it's always being with such skeptics in their thinking; "Something does not exist, because I ASSUME it does not exist". Steven Gibbs may or may not be the real thing, but considering that a lack of institutionalized education proves nothing when considering the names of other such pseudo scientists who actually have discovered something as high school drop outs. Names like; John Hutchison, Tim Ventura and Patrick Flanagan, who appear often today on discovery channel TV regarding "fringe science" with actual footage and physical proof regarding things like the "Hutchison Effect". UNFORTUNATELY now, any possible real footage, photos and physical evidence of say any UFO landing, UFO contact with aliens, Time Travellers from the future, working time machines, time travel experiences, etc, will never constitute the extraordinary smoking gun proof to any such extraordinary claims, because in the face of already assuming skeptics, these things could never possibly exist anyway and therefore must aways be the best result of trickery, hypnosis and computer CGI special effects. At that, there is no such thing as absolute proof, therefore presenting or asking for even the best of possible proof is nothing more then a person's waste of time! There are even skeptics who will tell you that the world is actually flat with no convincing otherwise; for to see it as round out there is nothing more then a hypnotic placebo trance effect when floating in zero gravity space! Here is my observation so far regarding HDRs. Regardless of people opinions, I have not actually used an HDR, therefore I can not give you a first hand account as of yet, however, that's not to say that they don't work. When looking at how to build them and from people's reports, I can say that HDRs are actually radionic machines used with electro magnets or with one electro magnet, depending on how you want to build them. A radionic machine is simply a tool that helps an individual "focus" a desired intent into reality without an exhausting concentrating effort, in much the same way as say using a tool for dowsing, but like a dowsing rod, it needs to be tuned in to a "zero point" field of consciousness for maximum results. Believe it or not, the same is true for the human mind. A person who can completely clear their mind and then focus on a desired intent for any extended period of time, does not need a dowsing rod, nor a radionics machine, nor even an HDR! As it so happens, people can actually achieve; mental, astral and even physical time travel, teleportation, apportation, invisibility, psychic force healing, and even levitation, by using concentrated meditation. This however is a lifetime of practise according to the achievements of the Dzogchen Tibetan monks, but if your looking for quicker results, a group collective intent of many individuals focused on a single point or person can produce good results, simply because people believe it works, such as the successful collective healings, etc, found in churches, temples, etc, which BTW is why many of the more ancient churches, temples and places of worship are found already existing on natural grid points. Meditation on places of power, which generate a lot of orgone can easily be directed with the mind for better results depending on how well one can focus, or how well one can be hypnotized to focus. Orgone is simply a natural generated psychic force energy consciousness where electro magnets can simply be used to compress or tune it into a zero point field. Then with the right intentions, anything is possible. I can see that an HDR is simply yet another tool one can use to achieve all these results, but without the physical body experiencing its complete exhaustion. A woman in Hawaii by the name of Gwen Totterdale is said to have achieved healing, physical and astral teleportation, and time travel, by experimenting with the collective energies of a large group of people around her. In time, others in her group where able to do this also, but not around those people with blocked minds. Simply put; time travel can not exist if it's not possible in a person's accepted reality. James Truthseeker. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Why I dont believe in HDRs
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top