Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Why the Concept That People That Do Not Vote Have No Voice is Absurd and Stupid
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Japrim" data-source="post: 136474" data-attributes="member: 7558"><p>Right.</p><p></p><p>If you vote for candidate A, you are expressing willful consent to being subject to the terms and conditions of the election and form of government.</p><p>If you vote for candidate B, you are expressing willful consent to being subject to the terms and conditions of the election and form of government.</p><p>If you vote for candidate C, you are expressing willful consent to being subject to the terms and conditions of the election and form of government.</p><p></p><p>Either way, you are voting to express willful consent to being subject to the terms and conditions of the election and form of government. </p><p></p><p>The terms and conditions of the election say that you recognize the winner as your legitimate leader, regardless of whether you voted for them or not. And the terms and conditions of the form of government say that you must obey it's edicts criminalizing or regulating victimless nonviolent behavior, or else face a penalty of up to and including deadly force against you.</p><p></p><p>Criminalizing nonviolent victimless behavior, using systematic coercion and violence to force everything, theft, murder, etc., etc.,...is evil.</p><p></p><p>Your choice in a government election is evil or evil or evil. It is essentially the same as picking a poison to drink.</p><p></p><p>Consider removing consent by boycotting the elections. Consider doing so with the stipulation that government must change, that it must not function using coercion and violence to enforce edicts. Essentially refuse to vote in mass until government agrees to remove the fundamental principle element of it's monopoly on coercion and the initiation of force to enforce edicts.</p><p></p><p>What happens is either government has to reassert it's fictitious authority and force people to do what it wants, or it has to supply what the people demand.</p><p></p><p>If it turns into a police state, if the government tries to use force, it's legitimacy is gone and all hell breaks loose. If it caters to the will of the people, if it supplies what the people demand, if it no longer uses force, then it no longer qualifies as a government, but instead functions as a service.</p><p></p><p>In the real world, free market principles of supply/demand rules. And that is how the people can reassert their power over government.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Japrim, post: 136474, member: 7558"] Right. If you vote for candidate A, you are expressing willful consent to being subject to the terms and conditions of the election and form of government. If you vote for candidate B, you are expressing willful consent to being subject to the terms and conditions of the election and form of government. If you vote for candidate C, you are expressing willful consent to being subject to the terms and conditions of the election and form of government. Either way, you are voting to express willful consent to being subject to the terms and conditions of the election and form of government. The terms and conditions of the election say that you recognize the winner as your legitimate leader, regardless of whether you voted for them or not. And the terms and conditions of the form of government say that you must obey it's edicts criminalizing or regulating victimless nonviolent behavior, or else face a penalty of up to and including deadly force against you. Criminalizing nonviolent victimless behavior, using systematic coercion and violence to force everything, theft, murder, etc., etc.,...is evil. Your choice in a government election is evil or evil or evil. It is essentially the same as picking a poison to drink. Consider removing consent by boycotting the elections. Consider doing so with the stipulation that government must change, that it must not function using coercion and violence to enforce edicts. Essentially refuse to vote in mass until government agrees to remove the fundamental principle element of it's monopoly on coercion and the initiation of force to enforce edicts. What happens is either government has to reassert it's fictitious authority and force people to do what it wants, or it has to supply what the people demand. If it turns into a police state, if the government tries to use force, it's legitimacy is gone and all hell breaks loose. If it caters to the will of the people, if it supplies what the people demand, if it no longer uses force, then it no longer qualifies as a government, but instead functions as a service. In the real world, free market principles of supply/demand rules. And that is how the people can reassert their power over government. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Why the Concept That People That Do Not Vote Have No Voice is Absurd and Stupid
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top