Search results


  1. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    How was I supposed to know if you knew it was legit or not? I've gotten people sending it to me thinking it was real. Also, you haven't proven NASA has created the biggest hoaxes in history. And yeah, I'm a believer in denial, despite the overwhelming evidence supporting my side. Good luck.
  2. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    How big were the windows? Were any ever directly facing the sun for long periods of time? How thick was the glass of the windows? What type of glass were the windows made of? Were the windows polarized? Was there every any cover over the windows? How much radiation should be coming through the...
  3. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    Woah woah woah. 3.86x10^26 watts per square meter? That's very wrong. That value is the energy the sun emits TOTAL, not per square meter. The value above, 1.36kW/m^2, is how much would be hitting the spacecraft, not the 386000000000000000000000 kW emitted by the sun. No. .75 inches (minimum)...
  4. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    There is no Northern anomaly. It isn't "packed" with radiation either, it's just an area where the inner belt gets a bit closer to the surface of Earth than normal. I've never heard that about Florida though, and there doesn't seem to be any problem for the other missions launched from Florida...
  5. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    I'm assuming you're talking about the total emitted power of the sun, right? You do know that the Earth only receives about 1/2.2billionth of that? 3.86x10^26 * .0000000045 = 1.73*10^17 watts. But, Earth is REALLY big. It has a cross section of 127,400,000km^2, so it's about 1.36kW/m^2, or...
  6. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    I still don't understand why it wouldn't be easier to just get rid of the tapes right away, or not make them. Why would the government want to keep the tapes if there's something on them that could expose a gigantic secret? It wasn't only costs that led to recording-over of the tapes. NASA had...
  7. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    I think you're thinking of the South Atlantic Anomaly. I've never heard that "pole" argument, though. Launching at the poles would have effects on the orbit that most people don't want. Mainly, rather than orbiting West-East, it would be much more North-South/South-North, which is really only...
  8. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    I did enjoy debating Perhaps I will make my own thread, if this goes on long enough without any progress made.
  9. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    Any evidence for any of this, besides Gagarin's well-documented crash? Only if you stay in the most intense areas of the belts for a few weeks, especially the inner belt. Apollo missed the inner belt almost entirely, and stayed in the weaker points of the belts for no more than 4 hours each...
  10. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    Why keep the tapes at all, then? Why not immediately destroy them, rather than wait 10 years? Hell, why even make them in the first place if you're going to put stuff on there that no one can see ever?
  11. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    If.. you know.. read what I wrote, you'd know it's not because of "reasons." The LM's descent engine cut off a few feet above the surface (to be precise, it was 7'2", or 2.2m according to this manual from NASA. It was not a foot above when it cut off. You'd also know that I never said there was...
  12. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    Would you mind explaining what doesn't sit right? I'm sure it boils down to a few possibilities that can easily be explained. I'm not sure what you're saying here. That'd actually be pretty difficult to hide. First, the size of the rocket necessary to even launch the spacecraft(s) to go to...
  13. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    First off, they likely didn't realize it was the Apollo tapes. If you read anything on what happened, you'll read that they were likely shipped to Goddard with other random tapes, and then recycled. They didn't know the tapes were Apollo tapes until years AFTER this occurred. The HBO satellites...
  14. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    In the volume NASA needed? In the late 70s - early 80s, where NASA's budget was at its lowest ever? In the time where magnetic tape was being phased out? I don't think so. If you want to read what NASA officially has to say on it, here you go: NASA - Update: Apollo 11 Tapes
  15. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    Uh what? This was the 80's. Data reels weren't in mass production any more, if they even were in production at all. NASA had begun switching to digital storage and this was one of the last times they used magnetic tapes. There's always been a shortage since the advent of digital storage.
  16. nickrulercreator

    Laura Murray Cicco sues NASA over vial of moon dust

    I also forgot to mention that you need to keep every astronaut quiet as well. 24 went on missions to the moon, but more trained as well that didn’t go. You also need to keep the people that trained them and walked them them through the faking of it quiet. You also need the people who wrote...
  17. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    Because we did record over the first moon landing, the high-definition copy of it at least. The low definition copy that people saw on TV as it happened exists just fine, and was actually restored for the 40th anniversary of the landing. It wasn't done to save space. The most likely scenario...
  18. nickrulercreator

    Laura Murray Cicco sues NASA over vial of moon dust

    I do, yes. Rockets have to have multiple stages as a result of the Tsiolkovsky Rocket Equation, basically. Apples and Oranges (also, they didn't have to make tight descending spirals, this was the final maneuver before impact of Flight 11, a VERY wide right-hand turnwhile Flight 175 was more...
  19. nickrulercreator

    Laura Murray Cicco sues NASA over vial of moon dust

    Space exploration is my specialty. The Apollo programs are likely the greatest technological achievement in human history. I've never been given a credible reason to doubt them, as all claims made by hoaxers have been easily proven wrong. Faking the missions would have been impossible due to...
  20. nickrulercreator

    Flat-Earth

    That's been explained as well, many times: You're only recycling already debunked claims. These claims have been proven wrong thousands of times.

Top