Search results

  1. Harte

    Debate Believers or skeptics

    It IS evidence of my absence. But not proof of it. I've been reading without logging in. Harte
  2. Harte

    Summoning a sexual spirit.

    I bet that would burn. OP - Find her a girlfriend. Harte
  3. Harte

    Debate Believers or skeptics

    My point exactly. It is evidence of a crime, not proof that a crime occurred. Which I would consider as evidence of paranormal activity, albeit admittedly weak evidence But you have not determined that. You have made a conscious choice (and probably a correct choice) to give the latter...
  4. Harte

    Debate What is the very nature of Time?

    If you go back and look, you'll see that it was the CERN comment I was responding to. It is YOU that was trying to change the subject. I have stated several times in this thread that neutrinos interact, though rarely (and that word "rarely"doesn't do justice to how truly rare such an...
  5. Harte

    Debate Believers or skeptics

    No, it obviously WAS evidence that they didn't exist. But they did, because evidence is not proof. By the way, the folk tales were evidence that the apes DID exist. Just like the empty cartridge shells and blood in my example was evidence that someone was shot, but he turned out to have been...
  6. Harte

    Debate Believers or skeptics

    Nobody is saying something doesn't exist. What I am saying is that absence of evidence is EVIDENCE of absence. NOT proof of absence. You didn't answer the question, by the way. So, you will say that unicorns exist? What about leprechauns? How do we come to the conclusion that these things are...
  7. Harte

    Debate What is the very nature of Time?

    No, the conversation was about CERN, not Fermilab. It's you that's "trying to use" Fermilab here, when the subject was neutrinos interacting with CERN's proton beams. There is no interaction between the neutrinos streaming in from space and CERN's proton beams. Harte
  8. Harte

    Debate Believers or skeptics

    Do unicorns exist? Harte
  9. Harte

    Debate Believers or skeptics

    Yes, it was. It was not proof, but it was evidence. Or, again, will you assert that the Inuit vacationed in South Florida? Harte
  10. Harte

    Debate Believers or skeptics

    I can stand outside and yell your name. If you don't answer even that is evidence that you are not home. Harte
  11. Harte

    Debate Believers or skeptics

    Do you see why I've said multiple times here that you are confused about the difference between "evidence" and "proof?" I've not tried to prove a single thing here, yet here you assert that I am. I'm not talking about ANY level of confidence at all. Just the basics of what evidence actually is...
  12. Harte

    Debate Believers or skeptics

    A search of your house that doesn't turn you up is evidence (not proof) that you are not in your house. Not sure how many times I need to explain this very basic and elementary fact. Harte
  13. Harte

    Time travelers...WHATS GOING TO HAPPEN SEPTEMBER 20th AT AREA 51?

    Nobody will show up to storm the base. But, maybe it'll rain. Harte
  14. Harte

    Debate Believers or skeptics

    No, it would definitely be evidence of your absence from your house though. But, you could be hiding in the walls, so it's not proof. Harte
  15. Harte

    Debate Believers or skeptics

    So, the Inuit might have vacationed in South Florida. Harte
  16. Harte

    Debate What is the very nature of Time?

    I wasn't wrong. Neutrinos interact with protons like one tiny pissant interacts with a Blue Whale. You'll note that the posts were concerning CERN, not some lab set up to actually detect neutrinos. Harte
  17. Harte

    Debate What is the very nature of Time?

    No, you can't read is all it is. Or you think that neutrinos can be detected by banging them into one of a quintillion protons. Harte
  18. Harte

    Debate Believers or skeptics

    Apparently, you think that in political polls they ask every citizen the question. Otherwise, you would know that sampling certainly IS evidence. Or, maybe you're still confused about the difference between evidence and proof. Harte
  19. Harte

    The Reason why President Trump WILL win the next election!!

    Biden will win the nomination. But it's far too late now to prevent a Trump landslide. Harte
  20. Harte

    Deactivate me

    No fish has ever made it out of my frying pan alive. Harte
Top