9/11 Deathbed confession by CIA agent


Thread starter #1

Einstein

Temporal Engineer
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
3,039
Likes
2,599
The CIA agent claims we blew up building 7. But the part of the video I thought that was really shocking was when a BBC announcer stated building 7 had collapsed 20 minutes before it actually did.

 

Carl Miller

Active Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
980
Likes
837
Whistleblowers. They have been doing all the disclose project. Kamikaze , close to death , most of them have nothing more to lose. Nothing more to win. Even children know what is really going on. People are not stupid.
I insist. I have nothing against National Security. Those areas belong to National Security. People must follow the law. But people, most invariably, unless the individual is top stupid. People in general are not dumb.
 
Thread starter #3

Einstein

Temporal Engineer
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
3,039
Likes
2,599
There is no National Security in the United States. The NSA is a terrorist organization. So is the CIA. It is becoming apparent that these organizations are the real criminals that pulled off 9/11.
 

Carl Miller

Active Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
980
Likes
837
@Einstein
If you sign up for some big website you will find many references to certain names. These are the names of paid Ufologists.
Now it is out of topic we are on 9/11.
Everybody knows 9/11 was a hoax. No one believes 16 moron Muslins did that s.
 

Opmmur

Time Travel Professor
Premium
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
4,813
Likes
3,092
The Real Story of 9 - 11

9 - 11 Cover-Up revisited


The Star Wars Beam Weapons

and
Star Wars Directed-Energy Weapons (DEW)(A focus of the Star Wars Program)

by

Dr. Judy Wood and Dr. Morgan Reynolds
(originally posted: October 17, 2006)

Page 5: Toasted Cars

At the time this article was being developed, many people expressed disbelief that energy weapons existed outside of science fiction until they were reminded of the Star Wars Program, also known as the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI)*. The name of this article was chosen as a reminder that energy weapons do exist and have been developed over 100 years. Most of this technology is classified information. It can also be assumed that such technology exists in multiple countries. The purpose of this article was to begin to identify the evidence of what happened on 9/11/01 that must be accounted for. In doing so, the evidence ruled out a Kinetic Energy Device (bombs, missiles, etc.) as the method of destruction as well as a gravity-driven "collapse."

*SDI was created by U.S. President Ronald Reagan on March 23, 1983.1 It is thought that SDI may have been first dubbed "Star Wars" by opponent Dr. Carol Rosin, a consultant and former spokeswoman for Wernher von Braun. However, Missile Defense Agency (MDA) historians attribute the term to a Washington Post article published March 24, 1983, the day after the Star Wars speech, which quoted Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy describing the proposal as "reckless Star Wars schemes."2 Before it was named the "Star Wars Program (SDI) in 1983, it was the Advanced Space Programs Development.3

12/12/10 -- Dr. Judy Wood


1Strategic Defense Initiative,
Wikipedia,
2Sharon Watkins Lang. SMDC/ASTRAT Historical Office.
"Where Do We Get Star Wars?",
The Eagle. March 2007.

3
Robert M. Bowman, former Director of Advanced Space Programs Development for the U.S. Air Force in the Ford and Carter administrations.

This page last updated, July 11, 2007

Shortcuts to pictures and more information:

Jump to
Introduction
Jump to Diane Sawyer Video
Jump to: Peeling Appearance
Jump to Other Anomalies
Jump to Lower Manhattan (picture)
Jump to FDR Drive
Jump to Toasted Interior (picture)
Jump to Towed?
Jump to Burning Cars
Jump to Missing Windows
Jump to Toasted Parking Lot
Jump to Intersection
Jump to Jet Fuel (kerosene) Fires
Jump to News Video
See also More Toasted Cars
(on a page not yet in this series).


Audio:
29 November 2006, Judy Wood narrates these pages web pages on
"The Dynamic Duo" with Jim Fetzer, Genesis Communications Network,
gcnlive.com, archive (mp3-1)(mp3-2) (mp3).
6 December 2006, Morgan Reynolds discusses these pages on
"The Dynamic Duo" with Jim Fetzer, Genesis Communications Network
, gcnlive.com, archive, (mp3)(mp3)
 

Opmmur

Time Travel Professor
Premium
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Messages
4,813
Likes
3,092
Here are the principal data that must be explained:

  1. The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain (at free fall speed "collapse").
  2. They underwent mid-air pulverization and were turned to dust before they hit the ground.
  3. The protective bathtub was not significantly damaged by the destruction of the Twin Towers.
  4. The rail lines, the tunnels and most of the rail cars had only light damage.
  5. The WTC mall survived well, witnessed by Warner Bros. Road Runner and friends.
  6. The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on our comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition.
  7. The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not bottom up.
  8. The demolition of WTC7 was whisper quiet and the seismic signal was no greater than background noise.
  9. The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.
  10. The upper 90 percent, approximately, of WTC7 was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.
  11. File cabinet with folder dividers survived.
  12. Office paper was densely spread throughout lower Manhattan, unburned, often along side burning cars.
  13. Vertical round holes were cut into buildings 4, 5 and 6, plus a cylindrical arc into Bankers Trust and into Liberty street in front of Bankers Trust.
  14. All planes except top secret missions were ordered down until 10:31 a.m. (when only military flights were allowed to resume), after both towers were destroyed, and only two minutes after WTC 1 had been destroyed.
  15. Approximately 1,400 motor vehicles were towed away, toasted in strange ways, during the destruction of the Twin Towers.
  16. The order and method of destruction of each tower minimized damage to the bathtub and adjacent buildings.
  17. Twin Tower control without damaging neighboring buildings, in fact all seriously damaged or destroyed buildings had a WTC prefix, and no others.
  18. The north wing of WTC 4 was left standing, neatly sliced from the main body which virtually disappeared.
  19. The WTC1 and WTC2 rubble pile was far too small to account for the mass.
  20. The WTC7 rubble pile was too small and contained a lot of mud.
  21. Eyewitness testimony about toasted cars, instant disappearance of people by "unexplained" waves, a plane turning into a mid-air fireball, electrical power cut off moments before WTC 2 destruction, and the sound of explosions.
  22. There were many flipped cars in the neighborhood of the WTC complex near trees with full folliage.
* The possibility that a technology exists. Since invention of the microwave for cooking in 1945 and laser beam in 1955*, commercial and military development of beam technology has proceeded apace, so use of high-energy beams are likely



What theories are available to explain these phenomena?
We can identify seven theories:

  1. Natural causes such as earthquakes and hurricanes
  2. Arson
  3. The official theory of airplane impact, fires and weakened steel collapsing
  4. Conventional demolition with explosives such as RDX, dynamite, etc.
  5. Demolition via thermite or its variants

  6. Fission or fusion nukes (and clean bombs)

  7. Beam weapons, energy weapons, directed-energy weapons (DEW)

No one proposes that an earthquake destroyed the Twin Towers from the top down. The theory is contradicted by nearly all the data above. For example, no earthquake can toast cars in inexplicable patterns.


In fact, the data refute theories a to e–natural, arson, official, conventional and thermite demolition–in particular the intact bathtub, minimal seismic impact, and "dustification" prove nothing close to 1 million tons of material slammed down on the WTC foundation and its sub-basements. The debris stacks left where the Twin Towers once stood hardly covered the ground. The rescue dogs and workers did not climb up a tall pile but had to repel down to search for survivors. The arson and thermite theories fail to explain every data point, but all the unburned paper in particular refute any high-temperature based hypothesis.

The nuclear theory fails because an explosion powerful enough to turn most of each tower to dust would have seriously damaged the bathtub, probably flooded lower Manhattan, and spiked a high Richter reading. It violates a number of data points, including the observed top-down disintegration. And if a nuke were at the top, it could not progressively destroy lower floors and there were only a few steel beams tossed onto adjacent buildings and none above the 20th floor. Lots of aluminum cladding was tossed onto neighboring buildings’ roofs but no steel beams. How could a nuke be so selective? It could not. Nor can a nuke explain the toasted cars.

All the data are consistent with an energy weapon. For example, consider the round holes in buildings 5 and 6 and in Liberty Street. A directed-energy weapon by definition could cut into buildings, destroy material and leave discrete boundaries in the buildings. We know of no other explanation that has been offered for these peculiar holes. Similarly, some 1,400 cars were toasted in inexplicable patterns, and no alternative explanation to energy displacement has been offered.
 

Carl Miller

Active Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
980
Likes
837
upload_2017-9-3_8-55-20.png

Smoothed granite from thermo-nuclear detonation in the WTC foundation

Image source: Khalezov, Dmitri. “911thology”
 
Last edited: