Mario Duncan
New Member
- Messages
- 1
Should time travel exist I would love if someone (particularly a physicist) could verify the specific science behind my hypothesis on a theoretical level. Im not sure if anyone has ever thought about this but because of Einsteins theory of relativity we know that time is relative which is key here. Should you take off on a rocket that travels a distance of 1 light year at lets just say 2 light years per hour you would reach the light year mark in what would be an hour for person on board. The ship moved twice the speed of light and so it would take an additional light year for the light from the "Present Time" to reach you from this position in space . Imagining that there is a device that could accurately magnify on to the earth like a giant telescope for instance that could clearly see earth from this distance and its inhabitants then what would be visible would be the events that transpired a year ago from the present time as the light from that time would be visible to your eyes because the light from the present moment at which you left hasn't reached your eyes yet meaning that time travel is possible however only observable.
This explains the lack of participants in Steven hawking time traveler party as anyone who could have received the invitation could attend because the events of the party have already happened and are only observable. This would mean that tampering with timelines would not be possible and any time traveling paradoxes like if you were to become your become your own grandfather all Marty Mcfly style would not be possible because you could not assimilate into the previous time only observe from your position in space and time. This would also eliminate the idea of multiple timelines because if timelines cannot be tampered with one cannot generate multiple timelines by changing a past event, The only possible theory at that point would be that there are multiple time lines that just simply cannot interact with one other which would could not be proven definitively with any evidence or scientific theory im aware of with my 11th grade education. Additionally the formula to produce the amount of observable time you wanna see should be something along the line of T(time you want to observe ) is equal to the speed of light(c) multiplied by the amount of years you want to observe so T=nc which may be oversimplified im not sure but thats the basic idea. so to observe the instance 10 years ago you need to move 10 light years away and observe earth. Also I would like to point out that there wil be no sound when observing because not only does sound travel significantly slower than light especially at such a distance but sound needs an ideal medium to travel like air which most certainly is not found in the emptiness of space.
Let me know if theres anything wrong with this hypothesis I would love to hear additions and criticisms
This explains the lack of participants in Steven hawking time traveler party as anyone who could have received the invitation could attend because the events of the party have already happened and are only observable. This would mean that tampering with timelines would not be possible and any time traveling paradoxes like if you were to become your become your own grandfather all Marty Mcfly style would not be possible because you could not assimilate into the previous time only observe from your position in space and time. This would also eliminate the idea of multiple timelines because if timelines cannot be tampered with one cannot generate multiple timelines by changing a past event, The only possible theory at that point would be that there are multiple time lines that just simply cannot interact with one other which would could not be proven definitively with any evidence or scientific theory im aware of with my 11th grade education. Additionally the formula to produce the amount of observable time you wanna see should be something along the line of T(time you want to observe ) is equal to the speed of light(c) multiplied by the amount of years you want to observe so T=nc which may be oversimplified im not sure but thats the basic idea. so to observe the instance 10 years ago you need to move 10 light years away and observe earth. Also I would like to point out that there wil be no sound when observing because not only does sound travel significantly slower than light especially at such a distance but sound needs an ideal medium to travel like air which most certainly is not found in the emptiness of space.
Let me know if theres anything wrong with this hypothesis I would love to hear additions and criticisms
Last edited: